Evidence of a Frontal Shot --- Part IV / The X-rays

[Gil Jesus]

https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/xrays-part-iv.mp4

[Ben Holmes]

Post by Gil Jesus
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/xrays-part-iv.mp4

The evidence is so overwhelming, that there can be no doubt that JFK
was hit more than once from the front.

This explains why believers absolutely refuse to acknowledge this
evidence, or discuss it.

[Gil Jesus]

On Mon, 04 Mar 2024 07:53:09 -0800, Ben Holmes wrote:

The evidence is so overwhelming, that there can be no doubt that JFK
was hit more than once from the front.

I tend to agree with that assessment. It seems to me that he was hit
at least twice from the front, one entering the skull in the right front
and exiting the rear. The second shot just skimmimg the head enough to tear
the scalp backwards. I believe that these shots were right on top of
each other and could have been the "boom-boom" some of the witnesses heard.

It would also make sense why some witnesses described the head shot as the
third shot and others, like Chaney were fooled by the closeness of the shots
to think it was the second shot.

"How could a bullet fired from behind tear the scalp from the front, back ?"
----Dallas doctor Joel Goldstrich

[Ben Holmes]

Post by Ben Holmes
The evidence is so overwhelming, that there can be no doubt that JFK
was hit more than once from the front.
I tend to agree with that assessment. It seems to me that he was hit
at least twice from the front, one entering the skull in the right front
and exiting the rear. The second shot just skimmimg the head enough to tear
the scalp backwards. I believe that these shots were right on top of
each other and could have been the "boom-boom" some of the witnesses heard.
It would also make sense why some witnesses described the head shot as the
third shot and others, like Chaney were fooled by the closeness of the shots
to think it was the second shot.
"How could a bullet fired from behind tear the scalp from the front, back ?"
----Dallas doctor Joel Goldstrich

I see the same evidence somewhat differently. I think the scalp
"wound" was created at the pre-autopsy autopsy, rather than an almost
missed bullet.

And lest we forget, the throat was a shot from the front. My two
cents worth :)