Discussion:
REASON # 3 why I believe the government's case against Oswald is bullshit
(too old to reply)
Gil Jesus
2024-01-01 12:02:10 UTC
Permalink
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1725/why-governments-case-oswald-iii
Bud
2024-01-01 18:15:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gil Jesus
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1725/why-governments-case-oswald-iii
Can you cite for you idea that a judge in conservative Dallas would believe an accused double-murder`s claim of not being offered legal council over a respected member of the bar because that lawyer`s brother was a cop?
Donald Willis
2024-01-01 19:08:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bud
Post by Gil Jesus
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1725/why-governments-case-oswald-iii
Can you cite for you idea that a judge in conservative Dallas would believe an accused double-murder`s claim of not being offered legal council over a respected member of the bar because that lawyer`s brother was a cop?
Didn't know a murder could make a claim...
Gil Jesus
2024-01-01 21:54:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Donald Willis
Didn't know a murder could make a claim...
"Bud" doesn't click on links. If you post only a link, you screw "Bud" up royally.
"Bud" is scared shitless ( chickenshit ) to click on links because he's a paranoid schizo.
Because he refuses to click on the links, he doesn't know what the subject matter is.
As a result, his comments usually have nothing to do with the topic.

So just ignore him.
Bud
2024-01-01 22:16:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by Donald Willis
Didn't know a murder could make a claim...
"Bud" doesn't click on links. If you post only a link, you screw "Bud" up royally.
How so? I just don`t hit them.
Post by Gil Jesus
"Bud" is scared shitless ( chickenshit ) to click on links because he's a paranoid schizo.
That is what you have deluded yourself into thinking. You always do that with information, spin it into some form you are comfortable with.
Post by Gil Jesus
Because he refuses to click on the links, he doesn't know what the subject matter is.
I had that idea for awhile, it seemed a good a place as any to put it. You ignored it, of course.
Post by Gil Jesus
As a result, his comments usually have nothing to do with the topic.
As part of your Oswald Innocence project, you claimed it would have been thrown out of court due to Oswald not being offered counsel. I thought it was strange that you thought a court would rule in Oswald`s favor in such a challenge.
Post by Gil Jesus
So just ignore him.
Good enough, I just make the points I want to make when I want to make them.
Ben Holmes
2024-01-02 16:03:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bud
How so? I just don`t hit them.
Yet you trust Bugliosi:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
Chuck Schuyler
2024-01-02 14:05:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by Donald Willis
Didn't know a murder could make a claim...
"Bud" doesn't click on links. If you post only a link, you screw "Bud" up royally.
"Bud" is scared shitless ( chickenshit ) to click on links because he's a paranoid schizo.
Because he refuses to click on the links, he doesn't know what the subject matter is.
As a result, his comments usually have nothing to do with the topic.
So just ignore him.
Lol, we all know what the "subject matter is" with you guys: a series of non-stop begged questions and burden shifting surrounding your own laziness and inability to answer your own questions. You expect us to stand in by proxy for the WCR and chase down answers to your hobby points.

Pathetic.

When are you going to "research" the issue surrounding "evidence forms" used by the DPD in the 1960s? Seems a fella like you could find some ex-cops from Dallas of the era and email them or correspond with them somehow.

Have you done anything about this burning issue yet, or have you flitted off next to the next shiny object that grabs your attention? Your laziness is astounding.

Sheesh!
Ben Holmes
2024-01-02 16:03:14 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 06:05:14 -0800 (PST), Chuck Schuyler
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by Donald Willis
Didn't know a murder could make a claim...
"Bud" doesn't click on links. If you post only a link, you screw "Bud" up royally.
"Bud" is scared shitless ( chickenshit ) to click on links because he's a paranoid schizo.
Because he refuses to click on the links, he doesn't know what the subject matter is.
As a result, his comments usually have nothing to do with the topic.
So just ignore him.
Logical fallacies deleted.

Chuckles is just as terriified of the evidence as Chickenshit is.
Ben Holmes
2024-01-02 16:03:14 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 1 Jan 2024 13:54:29 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by Donald Willis
Didn't know a murder could make a claim...
"Bud" doesn't click on links. If you post only a link, you screw "Bud" up royally.
"Bud" is scared shitless ( chickenshit ) to click on links because he's a paranoid schizo.
Because he refuses to click on the links, he doesn't know what the subject matter is.
As a result, his comments usually have nothing to do with the topic.
So just ignore him.
Even if he should directly face the evidence & arguments, he can't
refute them.
Ben Holmes
2024-01-02 16:03:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gil Jesus
https://jfkconspiracyforum.freeforums.net/thread/1725/why-governments-case-oswald-iii
Can you cite...
Better yet:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
Loading...