Why did Brennan circle the TWO end windows, 6th floor?

[Donald Willis]

Notice that Howard Brennan circled only ONE single window on the 5th floor, and put Norman and Jarman in that same single window . And it was a window CLOSED at 12:30pm 11/22/63. His A (sniper) and B (Norman, Jarman) circling is very specific--one window for the latter, TWO for the sniper. Why did he allot two windows to the sniper? It could be the key to the whole shebang...

dcw

[Chuck Schuyler]

Notice that Howard Brennan circled only ONE single window on the 5th floor, and put Norman and Jarman in that same single window . And it was a window CLOSED at 12:30pm 11/22/63. His A (sniper) and B (Norman, Jarman) circling is very specific--one window for the latter, TWO for the sniper. Why did he allot two windows to the sniper? It could be the key to the whole shebang...
dcw

Or not.

[Donald Willis]

Post by Chuck Schuyler

Notice that Howard Brennan circled only ONE single window on the 5th floor, and put Norman and Jarman in that same single window . And it was a window CLOSED at 12:30pm 11/22/63. His A (sniper) and B (Norman, Jarman) circling is very specific--one window for the latter, TWO for the sniper. Why did he allot two windows to the sniper? It could be the key to the whole shebang...
dcw

Or not.

Not not. Put another way, Why would Brennan put Norman, Jarman, and the sniper all at two closed (at 12:30pm) windows? His diagramming of CE 477 has the sniper moving from the (open) 6th-floor east-end single window to the (closed) 2nd-from-the-end single window, or vice versa. Thus he has the sniper at two separate windows, at two different times, one open and one closed. At 12:37, a DPD officer reports, on the radio, that shots were fired from a "second window from the end", so someone else saw the same thing that Brennan apparently did...

dcs

[Bud]

Post by Chuck Schuyler

Notice that Howard Brennan circled only ONE single window on the 5th floor, and put Norman and Jarman in that same single window . And it was a window CLOSED at 12:30pm 11/22/63. His A (sniper) and B (Norman, Jarman) circling is very specific--one window for the latter, TWO for the sniper. Why did he allot two windows to the sniper? It could be the key to the whole shebang...
dcw

Or not.

Not not. Put another way, Why would Brennan put Norman, Jarman, and the sniper all at two closed (at 12:30pm) windows? His diagramming of CE 477 has the sniper moving from the (open) 6th-floor east-end single window to the (closed) 2nd-from-the-end single window, or vice versa. Thus he has the sniper at two separate windows, at two different times, one open and one closed. At 12:37, a DPD officer reports, on the radio, that shots were fired from a "second window from the end", so someone else saw the same thing that Brennan apparently did...

Drop the "open/closed" nonsense if that is what is causing you so much confusion.

dcs

[Donald Willis]

Post by Bud

Post by Chuck Schuyler

Notice that Howard Brennan circled only ONE single window on the 5th floor, and put Norman and Jarman in that same single window . And it was a window CLOSED at 12:30pm 11/22/63. His A (sniper) and B (Norman, Jarman) circling is very specific--one window for the latter, TWO for the sniper. Why did he allot two windows to the sniper? It could be the key to the whole shebang...
dcw

Or not.

Not not. Put another way, Why would Brennan put Norman, Jarman, and the sniper all at two closed (at 12:30pm) windows? His diagramming of CE 477 has the sniper moving from the (open) 6th-floor east-end single window to the (closed) 2nd-from-the-end single window, or vice versa. Thus he has the sniper at two separate windows, at two different times, one open and one closed. At 12:37, a DPD officer reports, on the radio, that shots were fired from a "second window from the end", so someone else saw the same thing that Brennan apparently did...

Drop the "open/closed" nonsense if that is what is causing you so much confusion.

dcs

OK. Brennan saw Norman & Jarman at the closed 5th floor window (3rd single window from the east end) below, as he diagrammed CE 477. Strange they'd watch the procession, though, from a closed window. But have it your way, or his...

[Bud]

Post by Bud

Post by Chuck Schuyler

Notice that Howard Brennan circled only ONE single window on the 5th floor, and put Norman and Jarman in that same single window . And it was a window CLOSED at 12:30pm 11/22/63. His A (sniper) and B (Norman, Jarman) circling is very specific--one window for the latter, TWO for the sniper. Why did he allot two windows to the sniper? It could be the key to the whole shebang...
dcw

Or not.

Not not. Put another way, Why would Brennan put Norman, Jarman, and the sniper all at two closed (at 12:30pm) windows? His diagramming of CE 477 has the sniper moving from the (open) 6th-floor east-end single window to the (closed) 2nd-from-the-end single window, or vice versa. Thus he has the sniper at two separate windows, at two different times, one open and one closed. At 12:37, a DPD officer reports, on the radio, that shots were fired from a "second window from the end", so someone else saw the same thing that Brennan apparently did...

Drop the "open/closed" nonsense if that is what is causing you so much confusion.

dcs

OK. Brennan saw Norman & Jarman at the closed 5th floor window (3rd single window from the east end) below, as he diagrammed CE 477. Strange they'd watch the procession, though, from a closed window. But have it your way, or his...

Your way is to look at the wrong things incorrectly. That`s how you get to the places you get to. Why would I bother to untie knots you are needlessly tying?

[Ben Holmes]

On Sat, 3 Feb 2024 19:25:20 -0800 (PST), Bud <***@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

[Ben Holmes]

On Sat, 3 Feb 2024 15:13:12 -0800 (PST), Bud <***@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

[Gil Jesus]

Notice that Howard Brennan circled only ONE single window on the 5th floor, and put Norman and Jarman in that same single window . And it was a window CLOSED at 12:30pm 11/22/63. His A (sniper) and B (Norman, Jarman) circling is very specific--one window for the latter, TWO for the sniper. Why did he allot two windows to the sniper? It could be the key to the whole shebang...
dcw

Brennan was a terrible witness.
Not only was he wrong about the number of windows, he was also wrong about the location of the window where he saw Jarman and Norman.
Loading Image...

He was also wrong about how many men were in the lineup he viewed. He testified there were "possibly seven, more or less one". ( 3 H 147 )
There were four.

He also testified that the man in the window was standing while shooting ( 3 H 144 ), a physical impossibility.

Brennan was so bad a witness that the Warren Commission could not use his testimony to conclude Oswald fired from the window, ( Report, pg. 145-146 )
but that didn't stop them from describing him as "an accurrate observer ". ( ibid., pg. 145 )

What a joke.

[Donald Willis]

Post by Gil Jesus

Notice that Howard Brennan circled only ONE single window on the 5th floor, and put Norman and Jarman in that same single window . And it was a window CLOSED at 12:30pm 11/22/63. His A (sniper) and B (Norman, Jarman) circling is very specific--one window for the latter, TWO for the sniper. Why did he allot two windows to the sniper? It could be the key to the whole shebang...
dcw

Brennan was a terrible witness.
Not only was he wrong about the number of windows, he was also wrong about the location of the window where he saw Jarman and Norman.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Brennan-wrong-window-negroes.jpg
He was also wrong about how many men were in the lineup he viewed. He testified there were "possibly seven, more or less one". ( 3 H 147 )

That suggests that he didn't even attend a lineup, and the first DPD report card for that lineup mentioned neither him nor Sorrels.

dcw

Post by Gil Jesus
There were four.
He also testified that the man in the window was standing while shooting ( 3 H 144 ), a physical impossibility.
Brennan was so bad a witness that the Warren Commission could not use his testimony to conclude Oswald fired from the window, ( Report, pg. 145-146 )
but that didn't stop them from describing him as "an accurrate observer ". ( ibid., pg. 145 )
What a joke.