Discussion:
"Google Groups will no longer support new Usenet content"
(too old to reply)
Sam McClung
2023-12-15 00:02:53 UTC
Permalink
"Effective February 15, 2024, Google Groups will no longer support new Usenet content. Posting and subscribing will be disallowed, and new content from Usenet peers will not appear. Viewing and searching of historical data will still be supported as it is done today."

What does all this mean?
Hank Sienzant
2023-12-15 01:59:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sam McClung
"Effective February 15, 2024, Google Groups will no longer support new Usenet content. Posting and subscribing will be disallowed, and new content from Usenet peers will not appear. Viewing and searching of historical data will still be supported as it is done today."
What does all this mean?
It means you won’t be able to use Google to post here. If you are already use a non-Google Usenet client to read and post, this won’t affect you. If he use Google to read and post her, you will need to find a new one.

— quote —
Google Groups ending support for Usenet
If you work with Usenet groups in Google Groups, support for these groups is ending soon.

What’s changing?
Starting on February 22, 2024, you can no longer use Google Groups (at groups.google.com) to post content to Usenet groups, subscribe to Usenet groups, or view new Usenet content. You can continue to view and search for historical Usenet content posted before February 22, 2024 on Google Groups.

In addition, Google’s Network News Transfer Protocol (NNTP) server and associated peering will no longer be available, meaning Google will not support serving new Usenet content or exchanging content with other NNTP servers.

This change will not impact any non-Usenet content on Google Groups, including all user and organization-created groups. Most of the current Google Groups content is not Usenet content and will not be affected.

What do I need to do?
If you don’t actively engage with Usenet content, you don’t need to do anything. Current Usenet users will need to do two things before February 22, 2024 if they want to continue engaging with Usenet content:

Find a new Usenet client. Several free and paid alternatives are available, both web-based and application-based. To find a client, do a web search for "how do I find a usenet text client"
Find a new public Usenet server. The new client you choose will likely have a default server or a set of curated options for you. If not, to find a server, do a web search for "public NNTP servers."
Because Usenet is a distributed system, you do not need to migrate data. All of the Usenet content you can access today on Google Groups should already be synced to the new server you choose. After you select a new client and server, you can reselect the groups you’re interested in.

Why is Google Groups support for Usenet ending?
Over the last several years, legitimate activity in text-based Usenet groups has declined significantly because users have moved to more modern technologies and formats such as social media and web-based forums. Much of the content being disseminated via Usenet today is binary (non-text) file sharing, which Google Groups does not support, as well as spam.
— unquote —
JE Corbett
2023-12-15 11:22:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Hank Sienzant
Post by Sam McClung
"Effective February 15, 2024, Google Groups will no longer support new Usenet content. Posting and subscribing will be disallowed, and new content from Usenet peers will not appear. Viewing and searching of historical data will still be supported as it is done today."
What does all this mean?
It means you won’t be able to use Google to post here. If you are already use a non-Google Usenet client to read and post, this won’t affect you. If he use Google to read and post her, you will need to find a new one.
— quote —
Google Groups ending support for Usenet
If you work with Usenet groups in Google Groups, support for these groups is ending soon.
What’s changing?
Starting on February 22, 2024, you can no longer use Google Groups (at groups.google.com) to post content to Usenet groups, subscribe to Usenet groups, or view new Usenet content. You can continue to view and search for historical Usenet content posted before February 22, 2024 on Google Groups.
In addition, Google’s Network News Transfer Protocol (NNTP) server and associated peering will no longer be available, meaning Google will not support serving new Usenet content or exchanging content with other NNTP servers.
This change will not impact any non-Usenet content on Google Groups, including all user and organization-created groups. Most of the current Google Groups content is not Usenet content and will not be affected.
What do I need to do?
Find a new Usenet client. Several free and paid alternatives are available, both web-based and application-based. To find a client, do a web search for "how do I find a usenet text client"
Find a new public Usenet server. The new client you choose will likely have a default server or a set of curated options for you. If not, to find a server, do a web search for "public NNTP servers."
Because Usenet is a distributed system, you do not need to migrate data. All of the Usenet content you can access today on Google Groups should already be synced to the new server you choose. After you select a new client and server, you can reselect the groups you’re interested in.
Why is Google Groups support for Usenet ending?
Over the last several years, legitimate activity in text-based Usenet groups has declined significantly because users have moved to more modern technologies and formats such as social media and web-based forums. Much of the content being disseminated via Usenet today is binary (non-text) file sharing, which Google Groups does not support, as well as spam.
— unquote —
This reminds me of the early 1990s when our Prodigy group broke up over their change in pricing policies.

It's all good. It can be amusing exposing the silliness of the CTs but I'll be damned if I'm going to pay for the privilege.

When I was having trouble with Google a couple months ago, I explored other alternatives but the only free ones were for
trial periods only. I also found them difficult to use as opposed to Google Groups which is pretty intuitive.
Ben Holmes
2023-12-15 15:40:49 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 03:22:26 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
Post by JE Corbett
This reminds me of the early 1990s when our Prodigy group broke up over their change in pricing policies.
It's all good. It can be amusing exposing the silliness of the CTs but I'll be damned if I'm going to pay for the privilege.
When I was having trouble with Google a couple months ago, I explored other alternatives but the only free ones were for
trial periods only. I also found them difficult to use as opposed to Google Groups which is pretty intuitive.
The Good News never stops coming! I can hardly wait until Google says
goodbye!
Bud
2023-12-16 02:16:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ben Holmes
On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 03:22:26 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
Post by JE Corbett
This reminds me of the early 1990s when our Prodigy group broke up over their change in pricing policies.
It's all good. It can be amusing exposing the silliness of the CTs but I'll be damned if I'm going to pay for the privilege.
When I was having trouble with Google a couple months ago, I explored other alternatives but the only free ones were for
trial periods only. I also found them difficult to use as opposed to Google Groups which is pretty intuitive.
The Good News never stops coming! I can hardly wait until Google says
goodbye!
<snicker> Ben will be the last troll standing.
Ben Holmes
2023-12-18 15:26:08 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 18:16:14 -0800 (PST), Bud <***@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
Ben Holmes
2023-12-15 15:39:22 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 14 Dec 2023 17:59:31 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<***@aol.com> wrote:

You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.

More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

Are you proud of yourself?
BT George
2023-12-15 22:15:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Hank Sienzant
Post by Sam McClung
"Effective February 15, 2024, Google Groups will no longer support new Usenet content. Posting and subscribing will be disallowed, and new content from Usenet peers will not appear. Viewing and searching of historical data will still be supported as it is done today."
What does all this mean?
It means you won’t be able to use Google to post here. If you are already use a non-Google Usenet client to read and post, this won’t affect you. If he use Google to read and post her, you will need to find a new one.
I've tried an Usenet reader once and wasn't impressed. What do you use?
Post by Hank Sienzant
— quote —
Google Groups ending support for Usenet
If you work with Usenet groups in Google Groups, support for these groups is ending soon.
What’s changing?
Starting on February 22, 2024, you can no longer use Google Groups (at groups.google.com) to post content to Usenet groups, subscribe to Usenet groups, or view new Usenet content. You can continue to view and search for historical Usenet content posted before February 22, 2024 on Google Groups.
In addition, Google’s Network News Transfer Protocol (NNTP) server and associated peering will no longer be available, meaning Google will not support serving new Usenet content or exchanging content with other NNTP servers.
This change will not impact any non-Usenet content on Google Groups, including all user and organization-created groups. Most of the current Google Groups content is not Usenet content and will not be affected.
What do I need to do?
Find a new Usenet client. Several free and paid alternatives are available, both web-based and application-based. To find a client, do a web search for "how do I find a usenet text client"
Find a new public Usenet server. The new client you choose will likely have a default server or a set of curated options for you. If not, to find a server, do a web search for "public NNTP servers."
Because Usenet is a distributed system, you do not need to migrate data. All of the Usenet content you can access today on Google Groups should already be synced to the new server you choose. After you select a new client and server, you can reselect the groups you’re interested in.
Why is Google Groups support for Usenet ending?
Over the last several years, legitimate activity in text-based Usenet groups has declined significantly because users have moved to more modern technologies and formats such as social media and web-based forums. Much of the content being disseminated via Usenet today is binary (non-text) file sharing, which Google Groups does not support, as well as spam.
— unquote —
Sam McClung
2023-12-15 18:46:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sam McClung
"Effective February 15, 2024, Google Groups will no longer support new Usenet content. Posting and subscribing will be disallowed, and new content from Usenet peers will not appear. Viewing and searching of historical data will still be supported as it is done today."
What does all this mean?
It may mean Google is trying to avoid or minimize legal liability, which moodrated groups may also want to consider, that or having full time legal staff.
Hank Sienzant
2023-12-16 00:24:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Sam McClung
Post by Sam McClung
"Effective February 15, 2024, Google Groups will no longer support new Usenet content. Posting and subscribing will be disallowed, and new content from Usenet peers will not appear. Viewing and searching of historical data will still be supported as it is done today."
What does all this mean?
It may mean Google is trying to avoid or minimize legal liability, which moodrated groups may also want to consider, that or having full time legal staff.
Usenet predates Google. Google doesn't bear any responsibility towards the Usenet postings.
Google is just providing a means to read and post.

It’s not a profit center, it’s not at all related to their main profit generator, search-related ads. They are simply eliminating one more thing that’s not related to making money. Like AOL did five or more years ago, when they got rid of the comments section. Or before that, when Prodigy started to charge.
Ben Holmes
2023-12-16 00:37:46 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 16:24:22 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<***@aol.com> wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
Bud
2023-12-16 02:17:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ben Holmes
On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 16:24:22 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
You posted the wrong rote response, stupid.
Ben Holmes
2023-12-18 15:26:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bud
Post by Ben Holmes
On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 16:24:22 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
You posted the wrong rote response, stupid.
As Huckster claimed you spoke for him, clearly you've just been caught
in a lie again...

What a moron!!!
Loading...