Need Any More Proof That Huckster Sienzant's A Liar & Coward?

[Ben Holmes]

Ben has strangely decided not to do what he’d said he do: “…match
in length, detail, and number of citations any scenario posted by a
believer.”

Here's the proof that Huckster's a liar and a coward:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/nCl9JI5ZS30/m/YFhGAy_mAgAJ

Sadly, Huckster refuses to tell us the length of my response in
comparison to the length of his scenario.

He knows I didn't merely "match" it - but far exceeded it.

And although I've not asked him how many cites I gave in comparison to
his (zero) - he certainly won't publicly acknowledge this either.

[Bud]

Post by Ben Holmes

Ben has strangely decided not to do what he’d said he do: “…match
in length, detail, and number of citations any scenario posted by a
believer.”

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/nCl9JI5ZS30/m/YFhGAy_mAgAJ
Sadly, Huckster refuses to tell us the length of my response in
comparison to the length of his scenario.
He knows I didn't merely "match" it - but far exceeded it.
And although I've not asked him how many cites I gave in comparison to
his (zero) - he certainly won't publicly acknowledge this either.

You`re a sad creature, you know that?

[Gil Jesus]

Post by Bud
You`re a sad creature, you know that?

ROFLMAO.. that's like the frying pan calling the kettle black.

Talk about sad:

BUD LIES ABOUT THE LENGTH OF THE "GUNSACK":
Bud claims the "gunsack" was 41 inches.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/33a9MbNPYEg/m/rT_ERTztAgAJ
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
BUD LIES ABOUT HAVING BALLS:
But when a fellow employee went on a rant that the CIA killed Kennedy, he went mute like a little pussy.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/jYTjItta_PQ/m/7Zn8BZoHBgAJ
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOW STUPID IS BUD ?
When faced with the results of the rifle tests, Bud replied, "If you don't like the testing, ignore the results, stupid".
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/pytkVff8uXQ/m/B6P3xXfCAAAJ
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXAMPLES OF BUD'S "REASONING"

"BUD's" PREDICTION DURING CORONAVIRUS THAT NATIONAL GUARDSMEN WILL BE DEPLOYED TO RETAIL STORES TO PREVENT LOOTING :
"There won`t be goods for honest people and the store will close because there is no money to be made. I suppose at some point they will deploy the National Guard to the stores."

"BUD's" PREDICTION DURING CORONANVIRUS THAT THE GOVERNMENT WILL PAY PEOPLE'S UTILITY BILLS.
"They have stopped shutting off people who don`t pay their utility bills, so people will stop paying, so when this is over the government will have to step in and pay this backlog."

"BUD's" PREDICTION DURING CORONANVIRUS THAT HOSPITALS WILL FILL UP WITH ILLEGAL ALIENS
"Hospital beds will fill up with people in this country illegally."

"BUD's" PREDICTION DURING CORONANVIRUS ON CHINA
"China will withhold antibiotics."

"BUD's" PREDICTION DURING CORONANVIRUS THAT THERE WILL BE A BREAKDOWN OF LAW AND ORDER
"Once the law stops being enforced the lawlessness is not far behind."

It's all here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/LgegSTe8hBw/m/KIFD_yUlBQAJ
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"BUD's" PREDICTION DURING CORONANVIRUS THAT THE VIRUS WILL DESTROY MANKIND
"It seems possible to me that we could ping pong this virus back and forth among the populace until there are few, if any left."
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/LgegSTe8hBw/m/XQrzTkj3AgAJ
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"BUD" ON LIFTING THE QUARANTINE
"If they do decide to lift the quarantine, it will be into a world much more dangerous than it is right now."
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/LgegSTe8hBw/m/zXJm3XceAwAJ

None of "BUD's" predictions came true.

This is the village idiot and Warren Commission supporter who cries, "believe me, I know the truth".
ROFLMAO

Sure ya do.

This paranoid schizo has no credibility at all.
That's why all of his posts are either questions, comments or insults.

Can't wait until Feb. 22nd when we can killfilter this asshole and show the world how insignificant he really is.

[Ben Holmes]

Post by Ben Holmes

Ben has strangely decided not to do what he’d said he do: “…match
in length, detail, and number of citations any scenario posted by a
believer.”

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/nCl9JI5ZS30/m/YFhGAy_mAgAJ
Sadly, Huckster refuses to tell us the length of my response in
comparison to the length of his scenario.
He knows I didn't merely "match" it - but far exceeded it.
And although I've not asked him how many cites I gave in comparison to
his (zero) - he certainly won't publicly acknowledge this either.

Logical fallacy deleted.

Watch folks, as Huckster ABSOLUTELY REFUSES to point out this logical
fallacy.

[Bud]

Post by Ben Holmes

Post by Ben Holmes

Ben has strangely decided not to do what he’d said he do: “…match
in length, detail, and number of citations any scenario posted by a
believer.”

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/nCl9JI5ZS30/m/YFhGAy_mAgAJ
Sadly, Huckster refuses to tell us the length of my response in
comparison to the length of his scenario.
He knows I didn't merely "match" it - but far exceeded it.
And although I've not asked him how many cites I gave in comparison to
his (zero) - he certainly won't publicly acknowledge this either.

Logical fallacy deleted.
Watch folks, as Huckster ABSOLUTELY REFUSES to point out this logical
fallacy.

Wasn`t an argument, stupid, it was an observation.

"You`re a sad creature, you know that?"

[Ben Holmes]

On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 15:41:14 -0800 (PST), Bud <***@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

[NoTrueFlags Here]

Post by Ben Holmes

Ben has strangely decided not to do what he’d said he do: “…match
in length, detail, and number of citations any scenario posted by a
believer.”

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/nCl9JI5ZS30/m/YFhGAy_mAgAJ
Sadly, Huckster refuses to tell us the length of my response in
comparison to the length of his scenario.
He knows I didn't merely "match" it - but far exceeded it.
And although I've not asked him how many cites I gave in comparison to
his (zero) - he certainly won't publicly acknowledge this either.

No. No more proof is needed. We have plenty.

[Gil Jesus]

Post by Ben Holmes
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/nCl9JI5ZS30/m/YFhGAy_mAgAJ

Hanky's bought the Warren Commission lies hook, line and sinker.
The fact that he, or anyone else, would support a lie makes them liars as well.

[Ben Holmes]

On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 03:06:13 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus

Post by Gil Jesus

Post by Ben Holmes
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/nCl9JI5ZS30/m/YFhGAy_mAgAJ

Hanky's bought the Warren Commission lies hook, line and sinker.
The fact that he, or anyone else, would support a lie makes them liars as well.

Huckster has a tactic he often uses - when things get too hot for him
in this forum, he disappears for a few weeks. Then comes back and
pretends the posts he can't answer were never made...

Anyone care to bet whether Huckster's going to disappear?

[Hank Sienzant]

Post by Gil Jesus

Post by Ben Holmes
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/nCl9JI5ZS30/m/YFhGAy_mAgAJ

Hanky's bought the Warren Commission lies hook, line and sinker.
The fact that he, or anyone else, would support a lie makes them liars as well.

So if someone honestly believes something, they are lying if they repeat it?

What does that make conspiracy theorists, in an “Oswald did it, alone and unaided” person’s eyes?

Do you understand why your claim isn't helpful and is simply akin to ad hominem?

You're simply calling everyone you disagree with a liar. Not at all a meaningful argument.

[Ben Holmes]

On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 15:25:13 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant

Post by Hank Sienzant

Post by Gil Jesus

Post by Ben Holmes
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/nCl9JI5ZS30/m/YFhGAy_mAgAJ

Hanky's bought the Warren Commission lies hook, line and sinker.
The fact that he, or anyone else, would support a lie makes them liars as well.

So if someone honestly believes something, they are lying if they repeat it?

You honestly believe that the WCR accurately portrayed Mrs. Tice's
testimony?

Clearly you do - because this has been addressed before.

You're clearly a liar.

...

Post by Hank Sienzant
You're simply calling everyone you disagree with a liar.

Au Contraire... we're calling LIARS to be liars.

Here's more proof that you're a liar:

You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.

More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

Are you proud of yourself?