The Logical Thinking Of David Von Penis...

[Ben Holmes]

"The only possible way for Lee Harvey Oswald to be innocent of
shooting J.D. Tippit is if the following idiotic situation occurred
(which nobody could possibly even begin to believe happened on
Somebody other than Lee Oswald shoots Tippit with Oswald's revolver.
This "non-Oswald" shooter (who looks just exactly like Lee Harvey
Oswald, but really isn't him) then flees the scene of the Tippit
crime, dumping four shells on the ground as he runs away. This
non-Oswald shooter then meets up with the real Lee Oswald and hands
off the Tippit murder weapon to LHO. Oswald then proceeds to the Texas
Theater where he is arrested while in possession of the gun that
somebody else used to kill Officer Tippit just 35 minutes earlier."

The reason no-one would even begin to believe such a wacky theory is
that it's intentionally a wacky theory.

It's far easier to believe that the problems with chain of custody are
real, and caused by intentionally framing a suspect.

But Von Penis can't go there. That would be far too credible and
would explain evidence he can't explain.

[Gil Jesus]

The reason no-one would even begin to believe such a wacky theory is that it's intentionally a wacky theory.
It's far easier to believe that the problems with chain of custody are real, and caused by intentionally framing a suspect.
But Von Penis can't go there. That would be far too credible and would explain evidence he can't explain.

If Oswald were guilty of the crimes he was accused of, all the evidence would add up.
It doesn't. End of story.

[Ben Holmes]

On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 10:02:19 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus

Post by Gil Jesus

The reason no-one would even begin to believe such a wacky theory is that it's intentionally a wacky theory.
It's far easier to believe that the problems with chain of custody are real, and caused by intentionally framing a suspect.
But Von Penis can't go there. That would be far too credible and would explain evidence he can't explain.

If Oswald were guilty of the crimes he was accused of, all the evidence would add up.
It doesn't. End of story.

Indeed! I challenge believers to post ANY EVIDENCE AT ALL that they
think supports them... that is undisputed by other evidence.

Almost everything in this case is disputed... credibly... by other
evidence... yet believers simply refuse to acknowledge this fact.

[Bud]

Post by Ben Holmes
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 10:02:19 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus

Post by Gil Jesus

The reason no-one would even begin to believe such a wacky theory is that it's intentionally a wacky theory.
It's far easier to believe that the problems with chain of custody are real, and caused by intentionally framing a suspect.
But Von Penis can't go there. That would be far too credible and would explain evidence he can't explain.

If Oswald were guilty of the crimes he was accused of, all the evidence would add up.
It doesn't. End of story.

Indeed! I challenge believers to post ANY EVIDENCE AT ALL that they
think supports them... that is undisputed by other evidence.
Almost everything in this case is disputed... credibly... by other
evidence... yet believers simply refuse to acknowledge this fact.

You guys insist on looking at the wrong things incorrectly. Free country, do whatever you like.

[Ben Holmes]

On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 11:40:35 -0800 (PST), Bud <***@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

[Bud]

Post by Gil Jesus

The reason no-one would even begin to believe such a wacky theory is that it's intentionally a wacky theory.
It's far easier to believe that the problems with chain of custody are real, and caused by intentionally framing a suspect.
But Von Penis can't go there. That would be far too credible and would explain evidence he can't explain.

If Oswald were guilty of the crimes he was accused of, all the evidence would add up.

Perhaps your adding is the problem.

Post by Gil Jesus
It doesn't. End of story.

[Ben Holmes]

On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 11:37:31 -0800 (PST), Bud <***@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

[Bud]

Post by Ben Holmes

"The only possible way for Lee Harvey Oswald to be innocent of
shooting J.D. Tippit is if the following idiotic situation occurred
(which nobody could possibly even begin to believe happened on
Somebody other than Lee Oswald shoots Tippit with Oswald's revolver.
This "non-Oswald" shooter (who looks just exactly like Lee Harvey
Oswald, but really isn't him) then flees the scene of the Tippit
crime, dumping four shells on the ground as he runs away. This
non-Oswald shooter then meets up with the real Lee Oswald and hands
off the Tippit murder weapon to LHO. Oswald then proceeds to the Texas
Theater where he is arrested while in possession of the gun that
somebody else used to kill Officer Tippit just 35 minutes earlier."

The reason no-one would even begin to believe such a wacky theory is
that it's intentionally a wacky theory.

The reason conspiracy types don`t spell out their ideas is because it would be immediately apparent how wacky they are.

Post by Ben Holmes
It's far easier to believe that the problems with chain of custody are
real, and caused by intentionally framing a suspect.

You refuse to show problems with the chain of custody.

Post by Ben Holmes
But Von Penis can't go there. That would be far too credible and
would explain evidence he can't explain.

[Ben Holmes]

On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 11:39:14 -0800 (PST), Bud <***@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.