Discussion:
60 Years, And The Nutter Retards Just Can't Come Up With A Credible Explanation Of The Assassination!
(too old to reply)
NoTrueFlags Here
2023-11-21 06:46:10 UTC
Permalink
These guys are worse than astrophysicists. And much dumber!
Gil Jesus
2023-11-21 10:12:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by NoTrueFlags Here
These guys are worse than astrophysicists. And much dumber!
Their combined knowledge couldn't fill a hollow pea.
Chuck Schuyler
2023-11-21 13:58:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by NoTrueFlags Here
These guys are worse than astrophysicists. And much dumber!
Their combined knowledge couldn't fill a hollow pea.
Gil?

Questions await you.
JE Corbett
2023-11-21 15:32:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Chuck Schuyler
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by NoTrueFlags Here
These guys are worse than astrophysicists. And much dumber!
Their combined knowledge couldn't fill a hollow pea.
Gil?
Questions await you.
Gil doesn't have any answers. Only questions. He thinks the guy that raises the most questions wins.
Ben Holmes
2023-11-27 21:13:05 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 07:32:18 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Chuck Schuyler
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by NoTrueFlags Here
These guys are worse than astrophysicists. And much dumber!
Their combined knowledge couldn't fill a hollow pea.
Gil?
Questions await you.
Gil doesn't have any answers. Only questions. He thinks the guy that raises the most questions wins.
Corbutt doesn't have any answers. Only stupidity. He thinks the guy
that runs the most wins.
Bud
2023-11-27 23:44:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ben Holmes
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 07:32:18 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Chuck Schuyler
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by NoTrueFlags Here
These guys are worse than astrophysicists. And much dumber!
Their combined knowledge couldn't fill a hollow pea.
Gil?
Questions await you.
Gil doesn't have any answers. Only questions. He thinks the guy that raises the most questions wins.
Corbutt doesn't have any answers. Only stupidity. He thinks the guy
that runs the most wins.
Ironic.
Ben Holmes
2023-11-28 00:42:13 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 15:44:26 -0800 (PST), Bud <***@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
Ben Holmes
2023-11-27 19:56:20 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 05:58:30 -0800 (PST), Chuck Schuyler
Post by Chuck Schuyler
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by NoTrueFlags Here
These guys are worse than astrophysicists. And much dumber!
Their combined knowledge couldn't fill a hollow pea.
Gil?
Questions await you.
Amusing! There's yet to be a question that cannot be answered
credibly by critics - yet believers run...

EVERY

SINGLE

TIME!
Bud
2023-11-27 23:43:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ben Holmes
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 05:58:30 -0800 (PST), Chuck Schuyler
Post by Chuck Schuyler
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by NoTrueFlags Here
These guys are worse than astrophysicists. And much dumber!
Their combined knowledge couldn't fill a hollow pea.
Gil?
Questions await you.
Amusing! There's yet to be a question that cannot be answered
credibly by critics -
Stupid lie.

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/h8dDOpg537w/m/O_XOm0aHAAAJ
Post by Ben Holmes
yet believers run...
EVERY
SINGLE
TIME!
Ben Holmes
2023-11-28 00:42:27 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 15:43:53 -0800 (PST), Bud <***@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
Bud
2023-11-21 16:24:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by NoTrueFlags Here
These guys are worse than astrophysicists. And much dumber!
Their combined knowledge couldn't fill a hollow pea.
I know what happened at 10th and Patton on November 22nd, 1963. You haven`t a clue.
Donald Willis
2023-11-22 03:08:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bud
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by NoTrueFlags Here
These guys are worse than astrophysicists. And much dumber!
Their combined knowledge couldn't fill a hollow pea.
I know what happened at 10th and Patton on November 22nd, 1963. You haven`t a clue.
Maybe 10th & Patton in Podunk
Ben Holmes
2023-11-27 23:18:42 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 08:24:21 -0800 (PST), Bud <***@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
Loading...