How Can You Defend The Truth With Cowardice & Lies?

[Ben Holmes]

Title says it all.

[Bud]

Post by Ben Holmes
Title says it all.

That doesn`t look like a conspiracy argument.

I guess when you have nothing you have to try to make it about other people.

[Ben Holmes]

Post by Ben Holmes
Title says it all.

Chickenshit couldn't answer. So let's go back to his original
cowardice:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

[Gil Jesus]

Post by Ben Holmes
Chickenshit couldn't answer.

Chickenshit can never answer.
Chickenshit likes to accuse other people of doing the exact things he does.
That makes Chickenshit, besides being a coward and a liar, a hypocrite.
His parents must be proud.

[Gil Jesus]

Post by Bud
I guess when you have nothing you have to try to make it about other people.

You mean like you've done to me and Ben ?

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/souhqKNwNBw/m/VxIIx5hOAwAJ

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/pCpewZSJOas/m/W1TwWWsxCAAJ

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/skvoKRgw0WI/m/n7SajAcsBwAJ

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/OPvOE-2se5c/m/I2K_vtPFAAAJ

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/C53l69G9v68/m/v5P8DkbbAwAJ

In fact, most of the threads you've started have been about "other people".
I guess that means by your standard, you have nothing.
I'm not surprised, you've been bullshitting your way through this newsgroup for years.
And for all the hours you've spent here, you've accomplished absolutely nothing.
Because you're a loser.

[Bud]

Post by Bud
I guess when you have nothing you have to try to make it about other people.

You mean like you've done to me and Ben ?

I don`t need anything here, I`m not selling the idea of conspiracy. You guys are so you guys need something to support the premise.

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/souhqKNwNBw/m/VxIIx5hOAwAJ

Ok, that was a shot.

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/pCpewZSJOas/m/W1TwWWsxCAAJ

That one was addressing a specific idea of yours.

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/skvoKRgw0WI/m/n7SajAcsBwAJ

That was a shot.

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/OPvOE-2se5c/m/I2K_vtPFAAAJ

That was addressing a specific idea of Ben`s.

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/C53l69G9v68/m/v5P8DkbbAwAJ

That was a shot, but addresses an approach you take.

In fact, most of the threads you've started have been about "other people".

Wrong. Most of the posts I start are advancing a specific ideas.

I guess that means by your standard, you have nothing.

I don`t need anything, I`m not advancing the idea that a conspiracy was behind Kennedy`s murder.

I'm not surprised, you've been bullshitting your way through this newsgroup for years.

I`ve made a truckload of points that have never entered your consciousness.

And for all the hours you've spent here, you've accomplished absolutely nothing.

I never tried to accomplish anything but my own amusement.

Because you're a loser.

I was successful in using this place as a past time for my own amusement. You are losing and don`t even realize it, because you think you are doing something more.

[Ben Holmes]

On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 03:15:20 -0800 (PST), Bud <***@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

Of course, he can't.

Chickenshit is smart enough to realize that if he admits that Bugliosi
DID claim that the oval shape was "virtually conclusive evidence" of
an SBT, then *HE*, CHICKENSHIT, is going to have to name who the
person was *BEHIND* JFK.

And he can't do it.

[Donald Willis]

Post by Bud

Post by Bud
I guess when you have nothing you have to try to make it about other people.

You mean like you've done to me and Ben ?

I don`t need anything here, I`m not selling the idea of conspiracy. You guys are so you guys need something to support the premise.

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/souhqKNwNBw/m/VxIIx5hOAwAJ

Ok, that was a shot.

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/pCpewZSJOas/m/W1TwWWsxCAAJ

That one was addressing a specific idea of yours.

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/skvoKRgw0WI/m/n7SajAcsBwAJ

That was a shot.

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/OPvOE-2se5c/m/I2K_vtPFAAAJ

That was addressing a specific idea of Ben`s.

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/C53l69G9v68/m/v5P8DkbbAwAJ

That was a shot, but addresses an approach you take.

In fact, most of the threads you've started have been about "other people".

Wrong. Most of the posts I start are advancing a specific ideas.

I guess that means by your standard, you have nothing.

I don`t need anything, I`m not advancing the idea that a conspiracy was behind Kennedy`s murder.

I'm not surprised, you've been bullshitting your way through this newsgroup for years.

I`ve made a truckload of points that have never entered your consciousness.

And for all the hours you've spent here, you've accomplished absolutely nothing.

I never tried to accomplish anything but my own amusement.

Well, Bud, at least you admit that you're not looking for the truth, only your own amusement.

Post by Bud

Because you're a loser.

I was successful in using this place as a past time for my own amusement. You are losing and don`t even realize it, because you think you are doing something more.

[Bud]

Post by Donald Willis

Post by Bud

Post by Bud
I guess when you have nothing you have to try to make it about other people.

You mean like you've done to me and Ben ?

I don`t need anything here, I`m not selling the idea of conspiracy. You guys are so you guys need something to support the premise.

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/souhqKNwNBw/m/VxIIx5hOAwAJ

Ok, that was a shot.

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/pCpewZSJOas/m/W1TwWWsxCAAJ

That one was addressing a specific idea of yours.

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/skvoKRgw0WI/m/n7SajAcsBwAJ

That was a shot.

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/OPvOE-2se5c/m/I2K_vtPFAAAJ

That was addressing a specific idea of Ben`s.

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/C53l69G9v68/m/v5P8DkbbAwAJ

That was a shot, but addresses an approach you take.

In fact, most of the threads you've started have been about "other people".

Wrong. Most of the posts I start are advancing a specific ideas.

I guess that means by your standard, you have nothing.

I don`t need anything, I`m not advancing the idea that a conspiracy was behind Kennedy`s murder.

I'm not surprised, you've been bullshitting your way through this newsgroup for years.

I`ve made a truckload of points that have never entered your consciousness.

And for all the hours you've spent here, you've accomplished absolutely nothing.

I never tried to accomplish anything but my own amusement.

Well, Bud, at least you admit that you're not looking for the truth, only your own amusement.

I certainly wouldn`t look to you guys for truth.

Post by Donald Willis

Post by Bud

Because you're a loser.

I was successful in using this place as a past time for my own amusement. You are losing and don`t even realize it, because you think you are doing something more.

[Ben Holmes]

Post by Bud
I certainly wouldn`t look to you guys for truth.

Just unanswerable questions... such as:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

[Ben Holmes]

On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 01:21:07 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus

Post by Gil Jesus

Post by Bud
I guess when you have nothing you have to try to make it about other people.

You mean like you've done to me and Ben ?
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/souhqKNwNBw/m/VxIIx5hOAwAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/pCpewZSJOas/m/W1TwWWsxCAAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/skvoKRgw0WI/m/n7SajAcsBwAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/OPvOE-2se5c/m/I2K_vtPFAAAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/C53l69G9v68/m/v5P8DkbbAwAJ
In fact, most of the threads you've started have been about "other people".
I guess that means by your standard, you have nothing.
I'm not surprised, you've been bullshitting your way through this newsgroup for years.
And for all the hours you've spent here, you've accomplished absolutely nothing.
Because you're a loser.

And, lest we forget, he refuses to defend the faith he holds in the
WCR. If no-one posts - you'll never see a post from Chickenshit. He
has nothing to say on his own.

[Bud]

Post by Ben Holmes
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 01:21:07 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus

Post by Bud
I guess when you have nothing you have to try to make it about other people.

You mean like you've done to me and Ben ?
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/souhqKNwNBw/m/VxIIx5hOAwAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/pCpewZSJOas/m/W1TwWWsxCAAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/skvoKRgw0WI/m/n7SajAcsBwAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/OPvOE-2se5c/m/I2K_vtPFAAAJ
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/C53l69G9v68/m/v5P8DkbbAwAJ
In fact, most of the threads you've started have been about "other people".
I guess that means by your standard, you have nothing.
I'm not surprised, you've been bullshitting your way through this newsgroup for years.
And for all the hours you've spent here, you've accomplished absolutely nothing.
Because you're a loser.

And, lest we forget, he refuses to defend the faith he holds in the
WCR.

This isn`t a "defend the WC" forum, stupid.

And my "faith" is in my ability to reason.

Post by Ben Holmes
If no-one posts - you'll never see a post from Chickenshit. He
has nothing to say on his own.

I start posts sometimes. When I post ideas, they are rarely touched, so since there are only children who can`t discuss ideas here I don`t bother much.

[Ben Holmes]

On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 10:12:36 -0800 (PST), Bud <***@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

[Gil Jesus]

Post by Bud
This isn`t a "defend the WC" forum, stupid.

The why are you defenders of the Warren Commission here ?

It's a conspiracy forum, stupid.
And since you and your asshole buddies don't believe that any conspiracy existed in this case, that means that YOU DON'T BELONG HERE.
Thanks to Google and other newsreaders that provide free access to the Usenet, you're allowed in, but the fact is YOU DON'T BELONG HERE.

I'm not surprised you go places where you don't belong.
Knowing how much of a coward you are, I'll bet you use the little girls room when you have to go.
Will you turn all paranoid-schizo again the next time a virus comes along ?

You have a lot of nerve calling other people stupid.
You're a fucking mental case.

[Ben Holmes]

On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 12:55:09 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus

Post by Gil Jesus

Post by Bud
This isn`t a "defend the WC" forum, stupid.

The why are you defenders of the Warren Commission here ?
It's a conspiracy forum, stupid.
And since you and your asshole buddies don't believe that any conspiracy existed in this case, that means that YOU DON'T BELONG HERE.
Thanks to Google and other newsreaders that provide free access to the Usenet, you're allowed in, but the fact is YOU DON'T BELONG HERE.
I'm not surprised you go places where you don't belong.
Knowing how much of a coward you are, I'll bet you use the little girls room when you have to go.
Will you turn all paranoid-schizo again the next time a virus comes along ?
You have a lot of nerve calling other people stupid.
You're a fucking mental case.

Well stated. These cowards are constantly defending their refusal to
support their own beliefs by complaining that this isn't a forum for
that.

But even the only forum that ever existed for them, McAdam's forum,
you cannot find them defending the WCR. They can't.

[Bud]

Post by Ben Holmes
On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 12:55:09 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus

Post by Gil Jesus

Post by Bud
This isn`t a "defend the WC" forum, stupid.

The why are you defenders of the Warren Commission here ?
It's a conspiracy forum, stupid.
And since you and your asshole buddies don't believe that any conspiracy existed in this case, that means that YOU DON'T BELONG HERE.
Thanks to Google and other newsreaders that provide free access to the Usenet, you're allowed in, but the fact is YOU DON'T BELONG HERE.
I'm not surprised you go places where you don't belong.
Knowing how much of a coward you are, I'll bet you use the little girls room when you have to go.
Will you turn all paranoid-schizo again the next time a virus comes along ?
You have a lot of nerve calling other people stupid.
You're a fucking mental case.

Well stated. These cowards are constantly defending their refusal to
support their own beliefs by complaining that this isn't a forum for
that.

Otherwise known as the truth.

Post by Ben Holmes
But even the only forum that ever existed for them, McAdam's forum,
you cannot find them defending the WCR. They can't.

McAdams` site wasn`t a "defend the WC" forum, either.

[Ben Holmes]

On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 14:26:13 -0800 (PST), Bud <***@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

[Bud]

Post by Gil Jesus

Post by Bud
This isn`t a "defend the WC" forum, stupid.

The why are you defenders of the Warren Commission here ?

I told you why I am here, and it isn`t to defend the Warren Commission.

No matter how many times these things are explained to you the voices in your head drown out the message.

Post by Gil Jesus
It's a conspiracy forum, stupid.

Yes. Not an "attack the WC" forum. Not an "exonerate Oswald" forum.

Post by Gil Jesus
And since you and your asshole buddies don't believe that any conspiracy existed in this case, that means that YOU DON'T BELONG HERE.

You can`t show that follows.

I can come here to see what you have.

Post by Gil Jesus
Thanks to Google and other newsreaders that provide free access to the Usenet, you're allowed in, but the fact is YOU DON'T BELONG HERE.

Of course I do. I can go to any forum that I have an interest in the subject matter or the way the subject matter is handled (unless they are private).

I can go on an astronomy forum, despite never having been in space. I can go to a religious forum and contest their ideas.

Post by Gil Jesus
I'm not surprised you go places where you don't belong.

Don`t belong? This is the House Of Bud. I`ve owned you guys since I came. I`ve trained Ben to respond with rote replies to everything I write. He actually goes to the trouble of doing this, which only confirms my ownership of him. But I guess he sees it as a better course than trying to contest the points I make. I`m in good company, because he does it with Hank also.

Post by Gil Jesus
Knowing how much of a coward you are, I'll bet you use the little girls room when you have to go.

All your attempts at ridicule are sad and pathetic.

Post by Gil Jesus
Will you turn all paranoid-schizo again the next time a virus comes along ?

A virus that killed how many people worldwide?

Post by Gil Jesus
You have a lot of nerve calling other people stupid.

Just the stupid ones.

Post by Gil Jesus
You're a fucking mental case.

Perhaps, but that wouldn`t make you any smarter.

[Ben Holmes]

On Thu, 28 Dec 2023 14:23:38 -0800 (PST), Bud <***@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

[BT George]

Post by Ben Holmes
Title says it all.

You defend what you *think* is the truth with those things all the time. Why highlight that here?

[BT George]

Post by Ben Holmes
Title says it all.

It's never stopped you from defending your "truth", so why the moment of self-reflection here?