Poor Reasoning Skills Shown By A Believer...

[Ben Holmes]

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?

Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...

In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses
corroborating each other.

Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.

I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.

This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.

They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)

[Bud]

Post by Ben Holmes

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

I don`t know that they exist.

Post by Ben Holmes
Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?

Be specific. Name them and quote them.

Post by Ben Holmes
Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...

Who has shown they do?

Post by Ben Holmes
In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses
corroborating each other.

You have neglected to show that they do. You are doing your usual hot air machine routine.

Post by Ben Holmes
Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.
I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time.

Who specified a time for when Tippit was shot?

Post by Ben Holmes
Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

The time people radioed in the shooting is the only established time available.

Post by Ben Holmes
Absent any other information -

But there is. Oswald being seen there for one.

Post by Ben Holmes
this doesn't even make any sense.
This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers...

We look at the information correctly.

Post by Ben Holmes
and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.

As I`ve told you many times, you have to look at the available information correctly, for what it is and what it isn`t. You refuse to do that because it does harm to the silly games you play with the deaths of these men.

Post by Ben Holmes
They will try to defend it.

Don`t have to defend looking at things correctly. You don`t have to, it is a free country.

Post by Ben Holmes
(Or simply run away.)

[Ben Holmes]

Post by Ben Holmes

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?
Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...
In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses
corroborating each other.
Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.
I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.
This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.
They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)

Chickenshit proved my point...

[Bud]

Post by Ben Holmes

Post by Ben Holmes

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?
Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...
In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses
corroborating each other.
Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.
I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.
This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.
They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)

Chickenshit proved my point...

Your point was that you do nothing but blow hot air?

[Ben Holmes]

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?

Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...

In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses
corroborating each other.

Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.

I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.

This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.

They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)

And Chickenshit proved my point.

[Bud]

Post by Ben Holmes

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?
Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...
In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses
corroborating each other.
Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.
I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.
This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.
They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)
And Chickenshit proved my point.

You are repeating when you should be supporting.

They may as well shut this down, there are no adults on the conspiracy side to have a dialog with anyway.

[Ben Holmes]

You are repeating ...

Yep. If you didn't get it the first dozen times, I'll keep repeating

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?

Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...

In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses
corroborating each other.

Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.

I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.

This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.

They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)

Chickenshit has chosen to do both...

[Bud]

You are repeating ...

Yep. If you didn't get it the first dozen times, I'll keep repeating

Try supporting it.

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?
Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...
In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses
corroborating each other.
Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.
I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.
This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.
They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)
Chickenshit has chosen to do both...

[Ben Holmes]

You are repeating ...

Yep. If you didn't get it the first dozen times, I'll keep repeating

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?

Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...

In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses
corroborating each other.

Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.

I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.

This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.

They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)

Chickenshit has chosen to do both...

[Bud]

You are repeating ...

Yep. If you didn't get it the first dozen times, I'll keep repeating

It would be meaningful if you supported it rather than repeating it.

As it is, what can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?
Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...
In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses
corroborating each other.
Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.
I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.
This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.
They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)
Chickenshit has chosen to do both...

[Ben Holmes]

You are repeating ...

Yep. If you didn't get it the first dozen times, I'll keep repeating

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?

Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...

In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses
corroborating each other.

Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.

I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.

This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.

They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)

Chickenshit has chosen to do both...

[Bud]

You are repeating ...

Yep. If you didn't get it the first dozen times, I'll keep repeating

Repeating hot air doesn`t give it substance.

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?
Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...
In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses
corroborating each other.
Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.
I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.
This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.
They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)
Chickenshit has chosen to do both...

[Ben Holmes]

You are repeating ...

Yep. If you didn't get it the first dozen times, I'll keep repeating

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?

Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...

In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses
corroborating each other.

Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.

I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.

This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.

They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)

Chickenshit has chosen to do both...

[Bud]

You are repeating ...

Yep. If you didn't get it the first dozen times, I'll keep repeating

Pay attention, I`ve already dismissed this due to lack of support.

Lurkers will note that Ben did not name or quote a single witness.

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?
Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...
In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses
corroborating each other.
Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.
I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.
This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.
They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)
Chickenshit has chosen to do both...

[Ben Holmes]

You are repeating ...

Yep. If you didn't get it the first dozen times, I'll keep repeating

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?

Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...

In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses
corroborating each other.

Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.

I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.

This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.

They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)

Chickenshit has chosen to do both...

[Bud]

You are repeating ...

Yep. If you didn't get it the first dozen times, I'll keep repeating

No citations
No documents
No testimony
No exhibits
No witness videos
No links

We can learn nothing from Ben`s posts, they are hot air devoid of substance.

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?
Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...
In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses
corroborating each other.
Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.
I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.
This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.
They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)
Chickenshit has chosen to do both...

[Ben Holmes]

You are repeating ...

Yep. If you didn't get it the first dozen times, I'll keep repeating

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?

Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...

In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses
corroborating each other.

Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.

I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.

This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.

They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)

Chickenshit has chosen to do both...

[Bud]

You are repeating ...

Yep. If you didn't get it the first dozen times, I'll keep repeating

Aren`t you afraid that people will see that you have nothing?

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?
Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...
In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses
corroborating each other.
Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.
I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.
This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.
They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)
Chickenshit has chosen to do both...

[BT George]

Post by Bud

You are repeating ...

Yep. If you didn't get it the first dozen times, I'll keep repeating

Aren`t you afraid that people will see that you have nothing?

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?
Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...
In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses
corroborating each other.
Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.
I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.
This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.
They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)
Chickenshit has chosen to do both...

Hey Bud. Is there any way I can keep in contact with you if we needed to once this place collapses? I know you don't post under your real name (though I understand it is a moniker you do go by to some in real life.)

[Bud]

Post by Bud

You are repeating ...

Yep. If you didn't get it the first dozen times, I'll keep repeating

Aren`t you afraid that people will see that you have nothing?

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?
Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...
In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses
corroborating each other.
Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.
I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.
This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.
They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)
Chickenshit has chosen to do both...

Hey Bud. Is there any way I can keep in contact with you if we needed to once this place collapses? I know you don't post under your real name (though I understand it is a moniker you do go by to some in real life.)

Probably not necessary, the more I think about it the more it seems the timing is right to walk away. The opposition is pretty boring at this point, and the topic is talked out. It was clear to me years and years ago that these guys had nothing, and all they have done is solidify that assessment (when you have nothing you have to try to represent nothing as something). I`m content that I know who killed JFK and how the event played out, what more do I need?

I`m terrible at correspondence, I have a message from friend who called me who I haven`t talked to in years sitting in my answering machine for months now, still haven`t called him back. Haven`t talked to my brother over the holidays yet (not as bad as it sounds, he is staying at his daughter`s for the holidays and I didn`t want to bother him). Have a friend down in Florida I talk to every few months, but the calls are getting further and further between. I think I have my quota of people to neglect, I don`t need more guilt.

[Ben Holmes]

You are repeating ...

Yep. If you didn't get it the first dozen times, I'll keep repeating

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?

Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...

In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses
corroborating each other.

Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.

I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.

This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.

They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)

Chickenshit has chosen to do both...

[Gil Jesus]

The opposition is pretty boring at this point, and the topic is talked out. It was clear to me years and years ago that these guys had nothing, and all they have done is solidify that assessment (when you have nothing > you have to try to represent nothing as something). I`m content that I know who killed JFK and how the event played out, what more do I need?

Funny it wasn't boring until you had to pay.
Funny it's not boring enough to make you walk away right now.
ROFLMAO. You're such a liar.

[Ben Holmes]

On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 09:14:29 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus

Post by Gil Jesus

Post by Bud
The opposition is pretty boring at this point, and the topic is
talked out. It was clear to me years and years ago that these guys had
nothing, and all they have done is solidify that assessment (when you
have nothing you have to try to represent nothing as something). I`m
content that I know who killed JFK and how the event played out, what
more do I need?

Funny it wasn't boring until you had to pay.
Funny it's not boring enough to make you walk away right now.
ROFLMAO. You're such a liar.

Chickenshit, like all other believers in this forum, are cowards when
it comes to the evidence in this case.

Dozens and dozens of issues, Chickenshit has simply run from.

Such as his latest demonstrated cowardice, where he's TERRIFIED of
admitting that Bugliosi thought that the "oval shape" of Connally's
back wound was "virtually conclusive evidence" of the SBT.

Chickenshit knows that the moment he publicly agrees that Bugliosi
believed this - that he'll have to explain why JFK's back wound was
ALSO oval.

Liars... cowards... demonstrated characteristics of all believers in
this forum.

[Gil Jesus]

Post by Ben Holmes
Such as his latest demonstrated cowardice, where he's TERRIFIED of
admitting that Bugliosi thought that the "oval shape" of Connally's
back wound was "virtually conclusive evidence" of the SBT.
Chickenshit knows that the moment he publicly agrees that Bugliosi
believed this - that he'll have to explain why JFK's back wound was
ALSO oval.

And why the "exit" wound in the throat was not oval, but round ( and SMALLER than the oval "entrance" wound in the back )

Post by Ben Holmes
Liars... cowards... demonstrated characteristics of all believers in this forum.

Agreed.

[Ben Holmes]

On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 09:35:32 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus

Post by Gil Jesus

Post by Ben Holmes
Such as his latest demonstrated cowardice, where he's TERRIFIED of
admitting that Bugliosi thought that the "oval shape" of Connally's
back wound was "virtually conclusive evidence" of the SBT.
Chickenshit knows that the moment he publicly agrees that Bugliosi
believed this - that he'll have to explain why JFK's back wound was
ALSO oval.

And why the "exit" wound in the throat was not oval, but round ( and SMALLER than the oval "entrance" wound in the back )

Post by Ben Holmes
Liars... cowards... demonstrated characteristics of all believers in this forum.

Agreed.

The facts in this case simply force believers to lie, spout logical
fallacies, or run away...

[Bud]

Post by Gil Jesus

Post by Ben Holmes
Such as his latest demonstrated cowardice, where he's TERRIFIED of
admitting that Bugliosi thought that the "oval shape" of Connally's
back wound was "virtually conclusive evidence" of the SBT.
Chickenshit knows that the moment he publicly agrees that Bugliosi
believed this - that he'll have to explain why JFK's back wound was
ALSO oval.

And why the "exit" wound in the throat was not oval, but round ( and SMALLER than the oval "entrance" wound in the back )

By all means, produce the established measurement of both wounds so we can compare the two.

Post by Gil Jesus

Post by Ben Holmes
Liars... cowards... demonstrated characteristics of all believers in this forum.

Agreed.

You`re as delusional as he is.

[Ben Holmes]

On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 11:47:11 -0800 (PST), Bud <***@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

[Bud]

Post by Ben Holmes
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 09:14:29 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus

Post by Gil Jesus

Post by Bud
The opposition is pretty boring at this point, and the topic is
talked out. It was clear to me years and years ago that these guys had
nothing, and all they have done is solidify that assessment (when you
have nothing you have to try to represent nothing as something). I`m
content that I know who killed JFK and how the event played out, what
more do I need?

Funny it wasn't boring until you had to pay.
Funny it's not boring enough to make you walk away right now.
ROFLMAO. You're such a liar.

Chickenshit, like all other believers in this forum, are cowards when
it comes to the evidence in this case.

Your delusional assessment.

Post by Ben Holmes
Dozens and dozens of issues, Chickenshit has simply run from.

Your delusional assessment.

Post by Ben Holmes
Such as his latest demonstrated cowardice, where he's TERRIFIED of
admitting that Bugliosi thought that the "oval shape" of Connally's
back wound was "virtually conclusive evidence" of the SBT.

You delusional assessment.

Post by Ben Holmes
Chickenshit knows that the moment he publicly agrees that Bugliosi
believed this - that he'll have to explain why JFK's back wound was
ALSO oval.

I`ve already addressed this.

Post by Ben Holmes
Liars... cowards... demonstrated characteristics of all believers in
this forum.

Your delusional assessment.

[Ben Holmes]

On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 11:44:49 -0800 (PST), Bud <***@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

[Bud]

Post by Gil Jesus

The opposition is pretty boring at this point, and the topic is talked out. It was clear to me years and years ago that these guys had nothing, and all they have done is solidify that assessment (when you have nothing > you have to try to represent nothing as something). I`m content that I know who killed JFK and how the event played out, what more do I need?

Funny it wasn't boring until you had to pay.
Funny it's not boring enough to make you walk away right now.
ROFLMAO. You're such a liar.

You are boring.

[Ben Holmes]

On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 11:42:43 -0800 (PST), Bud <***@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

[Ben Holmes]

You are repeating ...

Yep. If you didn't get it the first dozen times, I'll keep repeating

I guess the biggest issue is the time. Alot of witnesses seem to
think Tippit was shot at 1:06pm for some reason. Why I don't know.

Because they associate an event (the shooting of Tippit) to a specific
time?

Just how dumb can it be to ask why "alot of witnesses" corroborate the
same time...

In ANY OTHER SITUATION - this would be taken by believers as fairly
definitive proof of something ... when you have multiple witnesses
corroborating each other.

Only when it doesn't fit the WC theory does it get thrown away.

I know when *I* specify a time for an event - it's because that event
happened at that time. Only a moron would whine that they can't
understand why a time was specified.

But the timing of the call made from Tippits radio, which I believe is
1:16pm, puts the timing of Tippits shooting much later.

Absent any other information - this doesn't even make any sense.

This shows the extent of the poor reasoning skills of believers... and
the inherent dishonesty of believers will be shown by the fact that
not a *SINGLE* believer will acknowledge the poor reasoning shown
here.

They will try to defend it. (Or simply run away.)

Chickenshit has chosen to do both...