Discussion:
This is interesting
(too old to reply)
Bud
2023-11-30 01:09:19 UTC
Permalink
After Brexit and Trump`s election in 2016, the powers that be decided the public can`t be trusted with information to form their own opinions, so efforts were made to control all narratives.

https://public.substack.com/p/ctil-files-1-us-and-uk-military-contractors
Gil Jesus
2023-11-30 10:58:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bud
After Brexit and Trump`s election in 2016, the powers that be decided the public can`t be trusted with information to form their own opinions, so efforts were made to control all narratives.
https://public.substack.com/p/ctil-files-1-us-and-uk-military-contractors
But according to you, governments don't participate in shady shit.
They've always told the truth.
JE Corbett
2023-11-30 11:59:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by Bud
After Brexit and Trump`s election in 2016, the powers that be decided the public can`t be trusted with information to form their own opinions, so efforts were made to control all narratives.
https://public.substack.com/p/ctil-files-1-us-and-uk-military-contractors
But according to you, governments don't participate in shady shit.
They've always told the truth.
Another of Giltardo's strawman arguments, AkA lies.
Ben Holmes
2023-11-30 15:39:36 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 03:59:45 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by Bud
After Brexit and Trump`s election in 2016, the powers that be decided the public can`t be trusted with information to form their own opinions, so efforts were made to control all narratives.
https://public.substack.com/p/ctil-files-1-us-and-uk-military-contractors
But according to you, governments don't participate in shady shit.
They've always told the truth.
Logical fallacy deleted.
BT George
2023-11-30 16:32:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by Bud
After Brexit and Trump`s election in 2016, the powers that be decided the public can`t be trusted with information to form their own opinions, so efforts were made to control all narratives.
https://public.substack.com/p/ctil-files-1-us-and-uk-military-contractors
But according to you, governments don't participate in shady shit.
They've always told the truth.
Has it ever occurred to you that as silly as this strawman is the *opposite* is equally silly? (I.e., they are always lying and can never be trusted.)
Bud
2023-11-30 18:48:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by Bud
After Brexit and Trump`s election in 2016, the powers that be decided the public can`t be trusted with information to form their own opinions, so efforts were made to control all narratives.
https://public.substack.com/p/ctil-files-1-us-and-uk-military-contractors
But according to you, governments don't participate in shady shit.
They've always told the truth.
You need ideas that are plausible. That everybody was out to get Oswald isn`t plausible.

You can`t even say what happened at 10th and Patton. In your mind, you`ve nullified all the witness testimony and nullified all the physical evidence. That leaves you with a dead cop on the ground and that`s it.
Ben Holmes
2023-11-30 18:55:50 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 10:48:40 -0800 (PST), Bud <***@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
Ben Holmes
2023-11-30 15:39:02 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 17:09:19 -0800 (PST), Bud <***@fast.net>
wrote:

What's truly interesting is the questions Chickenshit can't answer:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
Loading...