"Doubt Is Our Product..."

[NoTrueFlags Here]

This is what the cigarette companies said in internal memos:" Doubt is our product since it is the best means of competing with the 'body of fact' that exists in the mind of the public. It is also the means of establishing a controversy."

This seems the approach favored by certain "conspiracy theorists" who should be viewed with suspicion. Anybody who mockinbirds "We'll never know what happened" sentiment should be rejected out of hand if you want to know what happened. You'll never find out by following such people who say you will never know. They help the murderers to get away with their murder. The body of fact is there to be examined. That is what you should do, examine the body of fact, if you want to know what happened. Don't follow mockingbirds.

[Hank Sienzant]

This is what the cigarette companies said in internal memos:" Doubt is our product since it is the best means of competing with the 'body of fact' that exists in the evidence. It is also the means of establishing a controversy."
This seems the approach favored by all "conspiracy theorists" who should be viewed with suspicion. Anybody who mockingbirds "We'll never know what happened" sentiment should be rejected out of hand if you want to know what happened. You'll never find out by following such people who say you will never know. They help the murderer, Lee Harvey Oswald, to get away with his murder. The body of fact is there to be examined. That is what you should do, examine the body of fact, if you want to know what happened. Don't follow mockingbirds.

Fixed that for you.

[NoTrueFlags Here]

Post by Hank Sienzant

This is what the cigarette companies said in internal memos:" Doubt is our product since it is the best means of competing with the 'body of fact' that exists in the evidence. It is also the means of establishing a controversy."
This seems the approach favored by all "conspiracy theorists" who should be viewed with suspicion. Anybody who mockingbirds "We'll never know what happened" sentiment should be rejected out of hand if you want to know what happened. You'll never find out by following such people who say you will never know. They help the murderer, Lee Harvey Oswald, to get away with his murder. The body of fact is there to be examined. That is what you should do, examine the body of fact, if you want to know what happened. Don't follow mockingbirds.

Fixed that for you.

Fix yourself.

[Gil Jesus]

They help the murderer, Lee Harvey Oswald, to get away with his murder.

Really ?
So you don't believe in the American system of justice where the accused gets to present his side of the story ?
Is that your world, Hank ?
A world where if they say he was guilty, he was guilty ?
Guilty until proven innocent ?
The Soviet system of justice ?

This case against Oswald was only the PROSECUTION'S side of the case.
We never heard from the defense.
But that's OK for people like you, because any defense is nothing more than someone trying "to get away" with his crime.
God, Hank, you're so unreasonable.

And yes, you need to fix yourself.

[Ben Holmes]

On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 02:02:42 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus

Post by Gil Jesus

They help the murderer, Lee Harvey Oswald, to get away with his murder.

Really ?
So you don't believe in the American system of justice where the accused gets to present his side of the story ?
Is that your world, Hank ?
A world where if they say he was guilty, he was guilty ?
Guilty until proven innocent ?
The Soviet system of justice ?
This case against Oswald was only the PROSECUTION'S side of the case.
We never heard from the defense.
But that's OK for people like you, because any defense is nothing more than someone trying "to get away" with his crime.
God, Hank, you're so unreasonable.
And yes, you need to fix yourself.

He will. On Feb. 22.

[Ben Holmes]

On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 02:02:42 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus

Post by Gil Jesus

They help the murderer, Lee Harvey Oswald, to get away with his murder.

Really ?
So you don't believe in the American system of justice where the accused gets to present his side of the story ?
Is that your world, Hank ?
A world where if they say he was guilty, he was guilty ?
Guilty until proven innocent ?
The Soviet system of justice ?
This case against Oswald was only the PROSECUTION'S side of the case.
We never heard from the defense.
But that's OK for people like you, because any defense is nothing more than someone trying "to get away" with his crime.
God, Hank, you're so unreasonable.
And yes, you need to fix yourself.

Huckster cannot publicly admit a *SINGLE* bit of defense evidence.
(even though he's knowledgeable enough to name some...)

[Ben Holmes]

On Sun, 4 Feb 2024 09:30:37 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant

Post by Hank Sienzant
Fixed that for you.

Sadly, you can't fix your own words:

You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.

More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

Are you proud of yourself?