Oh, goody! Meathead has solved the JFK assassination

[JE Corbett]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/who-killed-jfk-rob-reiner-says-he-solved-assassination/vi-AA1kmYaY?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=5f9ad89fd477477096208dd8a4397e0a&ei=4

Of course he's going to tell us in a 10 part series on his podcast. I'm completely
in the dark when it comes to the world of podcasts but my AI app tells me the
more listeners a podcast draws, the more advertisers will pay. I guess even a
Meathead figured out he can milk this thing for 10 episodes rather than telling
everyone all at once who killed JFK.

Hey, Meathead. I already know who killed JFK.

Hint: his initials were LHO.

[Ben Holmes]

On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 20:06:03 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
<***@gmail.com> wrote:

Logical fallacy deleted.

[Bud]

Post by Ben Holmes
On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 20:06:03 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
Logical fallacy deleted.

<snicker> Ben takes his trolling seriously.

[Ben Holmes]

On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 12:07:16 -0800 (PST), Bud <***@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

[Bud]

Post by Ben Holmes
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.

There`s a good troll.

[Ben Holmes]

On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 13:01:05 -0800 (PST), Bud <***@fast.net>
wrote:

So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?

Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.

It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)

So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.