Discussion:
The Warren Omission: witnesses who were never called
(too old to reply)
Gil Jesus
2023-12-29 22:58:13 UTC
Permalink
A video montage of witnesses who were never called to testify before the Warren Commission. Why not ?


Ben Holmes
2023-12-29 23:28:33 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 14:58:13 -0800 (PST), Gil Jesus
Post by Gil Jesus
A video montage of witnesses who were never called to testify before the Warren Commission. Why not ?
http://youtu.be/gb6jkBMBRi8
Some of them were quite incredible... and believers *SHOULD* be honest
enough to admit the problem here.

But they can't. Dishonesty forbids it.

My favorite is James Chaney... with a number of close runners up.
Believers simply have no explanation for why no-one questioned James
Chaney for the WCR.

Plenty of lies... but no explanations.
Donald Willis
2023-12-30 03:07:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gil Jesus
A video montage of witnesses who were never called to testify before the Warren Commission. Why not ?
http://youtu.be/gb6jkBMBRi8 "
Add Patrolman L.L. Hill. Not exactly a witness, but he was the only one of the five policemen who first reported from the depository area who did NOT testify at the hearings. Why? Clyde Haygood "replaced" him, assuming credit for the 12:37 transmission re James Tague and "the second window from the end", at the hearings and on the Henslee transcription of the DPD radio logs. The Warren Report actually reinstated Hill as the 12:37 speaker! Note that Carolyn Walther, in your montage, elsewhere said that the window at which she saw these two suspicious men was on a floor LOWER than the sixth--the second window from the end on the next floor down was open... The DPD must have had good reason for "losing" both Hill and his witness, whom I believe was Bob Jackson. Good enough reason...
Loading...