Discussion:
The 60th anniversary of the assassination has come and gone
(too old to reply)
JE Corbett
2023-11-28 03:29:45 UTC
Permalink
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a few
cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less than
what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues to
wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor. 99+% of the
population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient history.
Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it. The
news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of
assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the country,
it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit what we
say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK assassination.
Gil Jesus
2023-11-28 10:07:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by JE Corbett
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a few
cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less than
what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues to
wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor. 99+% of the
population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient history.
Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it. The
news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of
assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the country,
it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit what we
say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK assassination.
Another of your lies.
No interest in the subject ?
If that's true, then why are you here ?
Your presence here and those of your fellow trolls is proof that that's a lie.

You're willing to waste your life coming in here arguing every day with people you don't even know about a case ( according to you people ) that was closed 60 years ago.
Do athletes continue to play the game after the clock runs out and the game is over ?
Do lawyers continue to debate a case after the jury has rendered its verdict ?
Why would anyone continue to debate a case that has been closed ?
Does that make any sense ?
What the hell do you hope to accomplish by doing that ?

You people have offered NOTHING new in the form of evidence in 60 years.
You just keep running around in circles, chasing your tails and repeating the nonsense of the Warren Commission.
And when the inconsistencies in the evidence are pointed out to you, you try to explain them away by making excuses.
When I present official records questioning Oswald's guilt, you claim I'm looking at "the wrong things incorrectly".

ROFLMAO

Why on earth should you or anyone else care about what I, Ben, Dave Healy, Greg Parker, No Flags, or anyone else thinks about what happened to President Kennedy ?
No, I can tell you from EXPERIENCE that there's PLENTY of interest in this case. Not to brag but instead to make my point, this year alone I've done four webcast appearances "back by popular demand".
You'd prefer all of us to think that nobody cares so we could pack up and quit posting.
But that's not the truth and that's not going to happen.

So you just keep telling the world that there's no interest in the case while at the same time acting like there is.
You've been proven to be a liar in the past and this is just par for the course with you.
Actions speak louder than words and your actions prove that your words are lies.
You're not fooling anybody.
JE Corbett
2023-11-28 12:44:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by JE Corbett
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a few
cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less than
what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues to
wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor. 99+% of the
population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient history.
Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it. The
news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of
assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the country,
it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit what we
say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK assassination.
Another of your lies.
No interest in the subject ?
Another of your lies. I didn't say there was no interest in the subject. I said interest was waning. Why do you have to lie to
make your point.
Post by Gil Jesus
If that's true, then why are you here ?
For amusement only. I have no illusions that anything written here by anybody is going to move the needle of public opinion.
Post by Gil Jesus
Your presence here and those of your fellow trolls is proof that that's a lie.
Your statement is based on your lie that I said there was no interest in the subject. What the hell did you think I meant when
I wrote:

" Only a few small niche groups of assassination buffs continue to argue about it."?

Everyone who contributes to this forum, outside of the spammers, ia part of the niche groups of which I spoke.
Post by Gil Jesus
You're willing to waste your life coming in here arguing every day with people you don't even know about a case ( according to you people ) that was closed 60 years ago.
The case was closed 59 years ago with the publication of the WCR which remains the definitive explanation of the
assassination. The HSCA reopened the investigation and got a lot wrong although they did correctly ID Oswald as the
assassin. Ever since then bozos like you have been trying exonerate that little piece of shit without success.
Post by Gil Jesus
Do athletes continue to play the game after the clock runs out and the game is over ?
Who said this was a game. It's a clown show. The LNs just keep pointing that out to the clowns.
Post by Gil Jesus
Do lawyers continue to debate a case after the jury has rendered its verdict ?
Actually, yes. It's called the appeals process.
Post by Gil Jesus
Why would anyone continue to debate a case that has been closed ?
To point out the futility of the clowns.
Post by Gil Jesus
Does that make any sense ?
Probably not but who says amusement has to make sense.
Post by Gil Jesus
What the hell do you hope to accomplish by doing that ?
I'm not here to accomplish anything. I don't expect to change the minds of the clowns and I don't have any reason to believe
there are undecided lurkers out there. However, I did play a part in changing the mind of Dr. Bob Artwohl about 30 years
ago on the old Prodigy board. He came to that group a CT and left an LN and pointed to some of my arguments that had
changed his mind. I'm sure other LNs influenced him as well. He later became a contributor on the McAdams board but that
was before I got involved back in 2008. I don't know if he ever posted on this one.
Post by Gil Jesus
You people have offered NOTHING new in the form of evidence in 60 years.
We already have the hay in the barn. There have been technology advancements which have served to confirm the findings
of the WC which used what they had available at the time. We have been able to reduce the window of when the single
bullet struck to a few frames from the 210-225 window the WC concluded.
Post by Gil Jesus
You just keep running around in circles, chasing your tails and repeating the nonsense of the Warren Commission.
Actually, were's sitting in our easy chairs watching the clowns spin their wheels.
Post by Gil Jesus
And when the inconsistencies in the evidence are pointed out to you, you try to explain them away by making excuses.
When I present official records questioning Oswald's guilt, you claim I'm looking at "the wrong things incorrectly".
The excuses all come from your side. The evidence all point to Oswald so your entire case is based on coming up with
excuses to dismiss the evidence.
Post by Gil Jesus
ROFLMAO
Why on earth should you or anyone else care about what I, Ben, Dave Healy, Greg Parker, No Flags, or anyone else thinks about what happened to President Kennedy ?
Good question. The answer is we don't. We are amused by your feeble efforts.

Now for my question. Just what have you accomplished over the past several decades and what is it you hope to accomplish
in the future? What is your endgame?
Post by Gil Jesus
No, I can tell you from EXPERIENCE that there's PLENTY of interest in this case. Not to brag but instead to make my point, this year alone I've done four webcast appearances "back by popular demand".
Just how many viewers do you think you drew and what reason do you have to believe any of them were not already part of
the niche interest group of which I wrote earlier.
Post by Gil Jesus
You'd prefer all of us to think that nobody cares so we could pack up and quit posting.
Once again you resort to lying about my position. I have said interest in the subject is limited to a very small niche group. If
you believe otherwise, you are only fooling yourself. What percentage of the American people do you think even know this
group exists. I would wager that the actual percentage would have a lot of zeros to the right of the decimal point.
Post by Gil Jesus
But that's not the truth and that's not going to happen.
I know that's not going to happen. That's what makes it so funny, seeing a bunch of clowns kicking a dead horse. The hobby
will die when the clowns have all joined folks like Mark Lane, Harold Weisberg, Jim Marrs, Tom Rossley, etc. who all went to
their graves without ever being able to prove the unproveable, that someone other than Oswald took part in the assassination
of JFK. Nothing you have done in the past and nothing you will ever do is going to rewrite history. I think you realize that, even
if you won't admit it to yourself. You will continue to tilt at windmills until you are no longer able to tilt.
Post by Gil Jesus
So you just keep telling the world that there's no interest in the case
You keep lying about what wrote.
Post by Gil Jesus
while at the same time acting like there is.
You've been proven to be a liar
Should we count how many times you have repeated the same lie in just this one post?
Post by Gil Jesus
in the past and this is just par for the course with you.
Actions speak louder than words and your actions prove that your words are lies.
You're not fooling anybody.
Tell us how the actions of one man prove there is widespread interest in the JFK assassination.
Ben Holmes
2023-11-28 16:01:02 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 04:44:16 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by JE Corbett
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a few
cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less than
what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues to
wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor. 99+% of the
population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient history.
Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it. The
news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of
assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the country,
it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit what we
say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK assassination.
Another of your lies.
No interest in the subject ?
Logical fallacy deleted.
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
If that's true, then why are you here ?
For amusement only.
Corbutt admits amusement at the death of a President.
Post by JE Corbett
I have no illusions that anything written here by anybody is going
to move the needle of public opinion.
Of course not - only evidence can do that.
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
Your presence here and those of your fellow trolls is proof that that's a lie.
Your statement is based on your lie that I said there was no interest in the subject.
If 99+% doesn't care, this i indeed supports your lie.
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
You're willing to waste your life coming in here arguing every day with people you don't even know about a case ( according to you people ) that was closed 60 years ago.
The case was closed 59 years ago with the publication of the WCR which remains the definitive explanation of the
assassination.
Not according to the HSCA.
Post by JE Corbett
The HSCA reopened the investigation and got a lot wrong
Empty unsupported and uncited claims can be safely ignored.

And, as Huckster points out:

Curiously, you posted no evidence. no citations, no documents, no
testimony, no exhibits, no witness videos.

Only comments. We gain nothing from the above.

Which makes who exactly the fool?
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
Do athletes continue to play the game after the clock runs out and the game is over ?
Logical fallacy deleted.
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
Do lawyers continue to debate a case after the jury has rendered its verdict ?
Actually, yes. It's called the appeals process.
It's called the HSCA.

You lose!
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
Why would anyone continue to debate a case that has been closed ?
Logical fallacy deleted.
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
Does that make any sense ?
Probably not...
Corbutt admits Gil is right...
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
What the hell do you hope to accomplish by doing that ?
I'm not here to accomplish anything.
You've succeeded.
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
You people have offered NOTHING new in the form of evidence in 60 years.
Non-refutation deleted.
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
You just keep running around in circles, chasing your tails and repeating the nonsense of the Warren Commission.
And when the inconsistencies in the evidence are pointed out to you, you try to explain them away by making excuses.
When I present official records questioning Oswald's guilt, you claim I'm looking at "the wrong things incorrectly".
The excuses all come from your side.
Provably wrong.
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
ROFLMAO
Why on earth should you or anyone else care about what I, Ben, Dave Healy, Greg Parker, No Flags, or anyone else thinks about what happened to President Kennedy ?
Good question. The answer is we don't. We are amused by your feeble efforts.
Now for my question.
First you need to answer one...
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
No, I can tell you from EXPERIENCE that there's PLENTY of interest in this case. Not to brag but instead to make my point, this year alone I've done four webcast appearances "back by popular demand".
You'd prefer all of us to think that nobody cares so we could pack up and quit posting.
Once again you resort to lying about my position.
"99+%"...

Lie again, Corbutt - who do you think you're fooling?
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
But that's not the truth and that's not going to happen.
So you just keep telling the world that there's no interest in the case
You keep lying about what wrote.
"99+%..."
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
while at the same time acting like there is.
You've been proven to be a liar
in the past and this is just par for the course with you.
Actions speak louder than words and your actions prove that your words are lies.
You're not fooling anybody.
Hank Sienzant
2023-11-29 04:31:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by JE Corbett
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a few
cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less than
what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues to
wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor. 99+% of the
population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient history.
Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it. The
news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of
assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the country,
it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit what we
say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK assassination.
Another of your lies.
No interest in the subject ?
Another of your lies. I didn't say there was no interest in the subject. I said interest was waning. Why do you have to lie to
make your point.
Post by Gil Jesus
If that's true, then why are you here ?
For amusement only. I have no illusions that anything written here by anybody is going to move the needle of public opinion.
Post by Gil Jesus
Your presence here and those of your fellow trolls is proof that that's a lie.
Your statement is based on your lie that I said there was no interest in the subject. What the hell did you think I meant when
" Only a few small niche groups of assassination buffs continue to argue about it."?
Everyone who contributes to this forum, outside of the spammers, ia part of the niche groups of which I spoke.
Post by Gil Jesus
You're willing to waste your life coming in here arguing every day with people you don't even know about a case ( according to you people ) that was closed 60 years ago.
The case was closed 59 years ago with the publication of the WCR which remains the definitive explanation of the
assassination. The HSCA reopened the investigation and got a lot wrong although they did correctly ID Oswald as the
assassin. Ever since then bozos like you have been trying exonerate that little piece of shit without success.
Post by Gil Jesus
Do athletes continue to play the game after the clock runs out and the game is over ?
Who said this was a game. It's a clown show. The LNs just keep pointing that out to the clowns.
Post by Gil Jesus
Do lawyers continue to debate a case after the jury has rendered its verdict ?
Actually, yes. It's called the appeals process.
Post by Gil Jesus
Why would anyone continue to debate a case that has been closed ?
To point out the futility of the clowns.
Post by Gil Jesus
Does that make any sense ?
Probably not but who says amusement has to make sense.
Post by Gil Jesus
What the hell do you hope to accomplish by doing that ?
I'm not here to accomplish anything. I don't expect to change the minds of the clowns and I don't have any reason to believe
there are undecided lurkers out there. However, I did play a part in changing the mind of Dr. Bob Artwohl about 30 years
ago on the old Prodigy board. He came to that group a CT and left an LN and pointed to some of my arguments that had
changed his mind.
I arrived after you did and I recall a conspiracy theorist accused Bob of using an acronym backwards as his last name.

That particular CT said Artwohl stood for Lee Harvey Oswald Was The Real Assassin.

Hey, who needs evidence when you can just make up stuff (the motto of CTs everywhere).
Post by JE Corbett
I'm sure other LNs influenced him as well. He later became a contributor on the McAdams board but that
was before I got involved back in 2008. I don't know if he ever posted on this one.
At the time, Bob was an emergency room physician in Baltimore, MD, so no doubt he saw his share of bullet wounds. Last I looked, he was in private practice so where in Alaska.
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
You people have offered NOTHING new in the form of evidence in 60 years.
We already have the hay in the barn. There have been technology advancements which have served to confirm the findings
of the WC which used what they had available at the time. We have been able to reduce the window of when the single
bullet struck to a few frames from the 210-225 window the WC concluded.
Post by Gil Jesus
You just keep running around in circles, chasing your tails and repeating the nonsense of the Warren Commission.
Actually, were's sitting in our easy chairs watching the clowns spin their wheels.
Post by Gil Jesus
And when the inconsistencies in the evidence are pointed out to you, you try to explain them away by making excuses.
When I present official records questioning Oswald's guilt, you claim I'm looking at "the wrong things incorrectly".
The excuses all come from your side. The evidence all point to Oswald so your entire case is based on coming up with
excuses to dismiss the evidence.
Post by Gil Jesus
ROFLMAO
Why on earth should you or anyone else care about what I, Ben, Dave Healy, Greg Parker, No Flags, or anyone else thinks about what happened to President Kennedy ?
Good question. The answer is we don't. We are amused by your feeble efforts.
Now for my question. Just what have you accomplished over the past several decades and what is it you hope to accomplish
in the future? What is your endgame?
Post by Gil Jesus
No, I can tell you from EXPERIENCE that there's PLENTY of interest in this case. Not to brag but instead to make my point, this year alone I've done four webcast appearances "back by popular demand".
Just how many viewers do you think you drew and what reason do you have to believe any of them were not already part of
the niche interest group of which I wrote earlier.
Post by Gil Jesus
You'd prefer all of us to think that nobody cares so we could pack up and quit posting.
Once again you resort to lying about my position. I have said interest in the subject is limited to a very small niche group. If
you believe otherwise, you are only fooling yourself. What percentage of the American people do you think even know this
group exists. I would wager that the actual percentage would have a lot of zeros to the right of the decimal point.
Post by Gil Jesus
But that's not the truth and that's not going to happen.
I know that's not going to happen. That's what makes it so funny, seeing a bunch of clowns kicking a dead horse. The hobby
will die when the clowns have all joined folks like Mark Lane, Harold Weisberg, Jim Marrs, Tom Rossley, etc. who all went to
their graves without ever being able to prove the unproveable, that someone other than Oswald took part in the assassination
of JFK. Nothing you have done in the past and nothing you will ever do is going to rewrite history. I think you realize that, even
if you won't admit it to yourself. You will continue to tilt at windmills until you are no longer able to tilt.
Post by Gil Jesus
So you just keep telling the world that there's no interest in the case
You keep lying about what wrote.
Post by Gil Jesus
while at the same time acting like there is.
You've been proven to be a liar
Should we count how many times you have repeated the same lie in just this one post?
Post by Gil Jesus
in the past and this is just par for the course with you.
Actions speak louder than words and your actions prove that your words are lies.
You're not fooling anybody.
Tell us how the actions of one man prove there is widespread interest in the JFK assassination.
NoTrueFlags Here
2023-11-29 07:21:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Hank Sienzant
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by JE Corbett
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a few
cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less than
what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues to
wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor. 99+% of the
population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient history.
Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it. The
news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of
assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the country,
it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit what we
say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK assassination.
Another of your lies.
No interest in the subject ?
Another of your lies. I didn't say there was no interest in the subject. I said interest was waning. Why do you have to lie to
make your point.
Post by Gil Jesus
If that's true, then why are you here ?
For amusement only. I have no illusions that anything written here by anybody is going to move the needle of public opinion.
Post by Gil Jesus
Your presence here and those of your fellow trolls is proof that that's a lie.
Your statement is based on your lie that I said there was no interest in the subject. What the hell did you think I meant when
" Only a few small niche groups of assassination buffs continue to argue about it."?
Everyone who contributes to this forum, outside of the spammers, ia part of the niche groups of which I spoke.
Post by Gil Jesus
You're willing to waste your life coming in here arguing every day with people you don't even know about a case ( according to you people ) that was closed 60 years ago.
The case was closed 59 years ago with the publication of the WCR which remains the definitive explanation of the
assassination. The HSCA reopened the investigation and got a lot wrong although they did correctly ID Oswald as the
assassin. Ever since then bozos like you have been trying exonerate that little piece of shit without success.
Post by Gil Jesus
Do athletes continue to play the game after the clock runs out and the game is over ?
Who said this was a game. It's a clown show. The LNs just keep pointing that out to the clowns.
Post by Gil Jesus
Do lawyers continue to debate a case after the jury has rendered its verdict ?
Actually, yes. It's called the appeals process.
Post by Gil Jesus
Why would anyone continue to debate a case that has been closed ?
To point out the futility of the clowns.
Post by Gil Jesus
Does that make any sense ?
Probably not but who says amusement has to make sense.
Post by Gil Jesus
What the hell do you hope to accomplish by doing that ?
I'm not here to accomplish anything. I don't expect to change the minds of the clowns and I don't have any reason to believe
there are undecided lurkers out there. However, I did play a part in changing the mind of Dr. Bob Artwohl about 30 years
ago on the old Prodigy board. He came to that group a CT and left an LN and pointed to some of my arguments that had
changed his mind.
I arrived after you did and I recall a conspiracy theorist accused Bob of using an acronym backwards as his last name.
That particular CT said Artwohl stood for Lee Harvey Oswald Was The Real Assassin.
Hey, who needs evidence when you can just make up stuff (the motto of CTs everywhere).
Post by JE Corbett
I'm sure other LNs influenced him as well. He later became a contributor on the McAdams board but that
was before I got involved back in 2008. I don't know if he ever posted on this one.
At the time, Bob was an emergency room physician in Baltimore, MD, so no doubt he saw his share of bullet wounds. Last I looked, he was in private practice so where in Alaska.
Here Nutter Loon Hank Sienzant cites "Bob" as a probable bullet wound expert because he thinks "Bob" worked in an emergency room. And because "Bob" is a Nutter Loon, no doubt his primary qualification. Nutters really are insane. That's why they are called Nutters!
Hank Sienzant
2023-11-29 15:55:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by NoTrueFlags Here
Post by Hank Sienzant
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by JE Corbett
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a few
cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less than
what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues to
wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor. 99+% of the
population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient history.
Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it. The
news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of
assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the country,
it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit what we
say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK assassination.
Another of your lies.
No interest in the subject ?
Another of your lies. I didn't say there was no interest in the subject. I said interest was waning. Why do you have to lie to
make your point.
Post by Gil Jesus
If that's true, then why are you here ?
For amusement only. I have no illusions that anything written here by anybody is going to move the needle of public opinion.
Post by Gil Jesus
Your presence here and those of your fellow trolls is proof that that's a lie.
Your statement is based on your lie that I said there was no interest in the subject. What the hell did you think I meant when
" Only a few small niche groups of assassination buffs continue to argue about it."?
Everyone who contributes to this forum, outside of the spammers, ia part of the niche groups of which I spoke.
Post by Gil Jesus
You're willing to waste your life coming in here arguing every day with people you don't even know about a case ( according to you people ) that was closed 60 years ago.
The case was closed 59 years ago with the publication of the WCR which remains the definitive explanation of the
assassination. The HSCA reopened the investigation and got a lot wrong although they did correctly ID Oswald as the
assassin. Ever since then bozos like you have been trying exonerate that little piece of shit without success.
Post by Gil Jesus
Do athletes continue to play the game after the clock runs out and the game is over ?
Who said this was a game. It's a clown show. The LNs just keep pointing that out to the clowns.
Post by Gil Jesus
Do lawyers continue to debate a case after the jury has rendered its verdict ?
Actually, yes. It's called the appeals process.
Post by Gil Jesus
Why would anyone continue to debate a case that has been closed ?
To point out the futility of the clowns.
Post by Gil Jesus
Does that make any sense ?
Probably not but who says amusement has to make sense.
Post by Gil Jesus
What the hell do you hope to accomplish by doing that ?
I'm not here to accomplish anything. I don't expect to change the minds of the clowns and I don't have any reason to believe
there are undecided lurkers out there. However, I did play a part in changing the mind of Dr. Bob Artwohl about 30 years
ago on the old Prodigy board. He came to that group a CT and left an LN and pointed to some of my arguments that had
changed his mind.
I arrived after you did and I recall a conspiracy theorist accused Bob of using an acronym backwards as his last name.
That particular CT said Artwohl stood for Lee Harvey Oswald Was The Real Assassin.
Hey, who needs evidence when you can just make up stuff (the motto of CTs everywhere).
Post by JE Corbett
I'm sure other LNs influenced him as well. He later became a contributor on the McAdams board but that
was before I got involved back in 2008. I don't know if he ever posted on this one.
At the time, Bob was an emergency room physician in Baltimore, MD, so no doubt he saw his share of bullet wounds. Last I looked, he was in private practice somewhere in Alaska.
Here Nutter Loon Hank Sienzant cites "Bob" as a probable bullet wound expert because he thinks "Bob" worked in an emergency room.
That’s the logical fallacy of a Straw Man argument - I never said that.
Post by NoTrueFlags Here
And because "Bob" is a Nutter Loon, no doubt his primary qualification.
Name-calling is apparently one of your go-to logical fallacies. You ignore the fact that Artwohl entered Prodigy as a conspiracy believer and left convinced that Oswald was the lone assassin.
Post by NoTrueFlags Here
Nutters really are insane. That's why they are called Nutters!
No, the name derives from the fact that we accept the evidence Oswald was the ‘’lone nut” shooter of JFK and there is no reasonable evidence of a pre-existing conspiracy. Hence, “Lone Nutters”.

In your haste to spit bile, you shorten the name to Nutters and call us insane.

You must really not have any evidence of a conspiracy you care to discuss.
Gil Jesus
2023-11-29 16:51:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Hank Sienzant
there is no reasonable evidence of a pre-existing conspiracy.
Was there "reasonable evidence" of guilt in the 19 cases Wade got convictions on that were overturned on DNA evidence ?
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna25917791

Was there "reasonable evidence" of guilt when Wade convinced a jury to send an innocent man to the electric chair in 1954 ?
https://www.dmagazine.com/publications/d-magazine/2016/may/henry-wade-executed-innocent-man/

"Reasonable evidence" doesn't mean shit.
As Wade's track record shows, you can have all the "reasonable evidence" of something that is not true.
Or likewise have no "reasonable evidence" of somethng that is.

Henry Wade. Now there's a horse you can hitch your wagon to.
No "reasonable evidence" of a conspiracy to you mental midgets means none existed.

Gerry Ford was stupid but even he wasn't THAT stupid. He made sure in interviews to say that the Warren Commission found no EVIDENCE of a conspiracy, not that one never existed.

It's very easy to get away with murder when your allies are in control of the evidence.
JE Corbett
2023-11-29 17:17:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by Hank Sienzant
there is no reasonable evidence of a pre-existing conspiracy.
Was there "reasonable evidence" of guilt in the 19 cases Wade got convictions on that were overturned on DNA evidence ?
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna25917791
The jury thought so.
Post by Gil Jesus
Was there "reasonable evidence" of guilt when Wade convinced a jury to send an innocent man to the electric chair in 1954 ?
https://www.dmagazine.com/publications/d-magazine/2016/may/henry-wade-executed-innocent-man/
The jury thought so.
Post by Gil Jesus
"Reasonable evidence" doesn't mean shit.
I'm not surprise a CT would think so. Their beliefs are never based on evidence. Reasonable evidence is everything in the
criminal justice system. Without it, there would be nothing for a judge and jury to consider.
Post by Gil Jesus
As Wade's track record shows, you can have all the "reasonable evidence" of something that is not true.
Or likewise have no "reasonable evidence" of somethng that is.
19 wrongful convictions given the tens of thousands Wade prosecuted is hardly an excessive number. I would gladly wager that
other jurisdictions had very similar records. The criminal justice system is not perfect. Juries don't always reach the correct
verdict. The deck is stacked against the state on the principle that it is better to let a guilty man go free than to convict an
innocent man, but that doesn't guarantee there won't ever be wrongful convictions. The justice system requires proof beyond
a REASONABLE doubt that the accused committed a crime. If we required proof beyond all possible doubt, few people would
ever be convicted and we would have societal chaos, kind of like what we have no in big cities with Democrat mayors and
George Soros funded prosecutors. I'll take the Henry Wades over those guys any day.
Post by Gil Jesus
Henry Wade. Now there's a horse you can hitch your wagon to.
Gladly.
Post by Gil Jesus
No "reasonable evidence" of a conspiracy to you mental midgets means none existed.
You have provided no evidence that Henry Wade did anything improper in the short time he had jurisdiction over the case
against Oswald. Pointing to less than two dozen wrongful convictions over a 36 year term is hardly evidence Wade was an
unethical prosecutor nor that he did anything wrong in the case against Oswald.
Post by Gil Jesus
Gerry Ford was stupid but even he wasn't THAT stupid. He made sure in interviews to say that the Warren Commission found no EVIDENCE of a conspiracy, not that one never existed.
Which is exactly what should be said. It is theoretically possible Oswald had one or more accomplices for which no evidence
was ever uncovered. The fact that no compelling evidence of such has surfaced in 60 years makes that a highly unlikely
prospect. Why would you choose to believe in a conspiracy for which there is no evidence?
Post by Gil Jesus
It's very easy to get away with murder when your allies are in control of the evidence.
You have provided exactly zero evidence of any such alliance between your co-conspirators and law enforcement. You can't
even tell us who those co-conspirators were so how could you know there was an alliance between them and law
enforcement?.
Ben Holmes
2023-11-29 17:51:26 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 09:17:19 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by Hank Sienzant
there is no reasonable evidence of a pre-existing conspiracy.
Was there "reasonable evidence" of guilt in the 19 cases Wade got convictions on that were overturned on DNA evidence ?
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna25917791
The jury thought so.
And *this* shows your inherent dishonesty. You clearly didn't even
click on the link you responded to.
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
Was there "reasonable evidence" of guilt when Wade convinced a jury to send an innocent man to the electric chair in 1954 ?
https://www.dmagazine.com/publications/d-magazine/2016/may/henry-wade-executed-innocent-man/
The jury thought so.
More proof, if any more were needed, of your dishonesty.
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
"Reasonable evidence" doesn't mean shit.
I'm not surprise a CT would think so...
An Honest Man would agree. I understand why you don't.
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
As Wade's track record shows, you can have all the "reasonable evidence" of something that is not true.
Or likewise have no "reasonable evidence" of somethng that is.
Logical fallacy deleted.
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
Henry Wade. Now there's a horse you can hitch your wagon to.
Gladly.
Dishonesty sticks together...
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
No "reasonable evidence" of a conspiracy to you mental midgets means none existed.
You have provided no evidence...
And you're a liar... so what?
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
Gerry Ford was stupid but even he wasn't THAT stupid. He made sure in interviews to say that the Warren Commission found no EVIDENCE of a conspiracy, not that one never existed.
Logical fallacy deleted.
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
It's very easy to get away with murder when your allies are in control of the evidence.
You have provided exactly zero evidence ...
There you go again...
Ben Holmes
2023-11-29 17:43:47 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 07:55:54 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<***@aol.com> wrote:

You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.

More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

Are you proud of yourself?
Hank Sienzant
2023-11-29 16:02:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by NoTrueFlags Here
Post by Hank Sienzant
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by JE Corbett
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a few
cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less than
what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues to
wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor. 99+% of the
population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient history.
Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it. The
news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of
assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the country,
it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit what we
say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK assassination.
Another of your lies.
No interest in the subject ?
Another of your lies. I didn't say there was no interest in the subject. I said interest was waning. Why do you have to lie to
make your point.
Post by Gil Jesus
If that's true, then why are you here ?
For amusement only. I have no illusions that anything written here by anybody is going to move the needle of public opinion.
Post by Gil Jesus
Your presence here and those of your fellow trolls is proof that that's a lie.
Your statement is based on your lie that I said there was no interest in the subject. What the hell did you think I meant when
" Only a few small niche groups of assassination buffs continue to argue about it."?
Everyone who contributes to this forum, outside of the spammers, ia part of the niche groups of which I spoke.
Post by Gil Jesus
You're willing to waste your life coming in here arguing every day with people you don't even know about a case ( according to you people ) that was closed 60 years ago.
The case was closed 59 years ago with the publication of the WCR which remains the definitive explanation of the
assassination. The HSCA reopened the investigation and got a lot wrong although they did correctly ID Oswald as the
assassin. Ever since then bozos like you have been trying exonerate that little piece of shit without success.
Post by Gil Jesus
Do athletes continue to play the game after the clock runs out and the game is over ?
Who said this was a game. It's a clown show. The LNs just keep pointing that out to the clowns.
Post by Gil Jesus
Do lawyers continue to debate a case after the jury has rendered its verdict ?
Actually, yes. It's called the appeals process.
Post by Gil Jesus
Why would anyone continue to debate a case that has been closed ?
To point out the futility of the clowns.
Post by Gil Jesus
Does that make any sense ?
Probably not but who says amusement has to make sense.
Post by Gil Jesus
What the hell do you hope to accomplish by doing that ?
I'm not here to accomplish anything. I don't expect to change the minds of the clowns and I don't have any reason to believe
there are undecided lurkers out there. However, I did play a part in changing the mind of Dr. Bob Artwohl about 30 years
ago on the old Prodigy board. He came to that group a CT and left an LN and pointed to some of my arguments that had
changed his mind.
I arrived after you did and I recall a conspiracy theorist accused Bob of using an acronym backwards as his last name.
That particular CT said Artwohl stood for Lee Harvey Oswald Was The Real Assassin.
Hey, who needs evidence when you can just make up stuff (the motto of CTs everywhere).
Post by JE Corbett
I'm sure other LNs influenced him as well. He later became a contributor on the McAdams board but that
was before I got involved back in 2008. I don't know if he ever posted on this one.
At the time, Bob was an emergency room physician in Baltimore, MD, so no doubt he saw his share of bullet wounds. Last I looked, he was in private practice so where in Alaska.
Here Nutter Loon Hank Sienzant cites "Bob" as a probable bullet wound expert because he thinks "Bob" worked in an emergency room. And because "Bob" is a Nutter Loon, no doubt his primary qualification. Nutters really are insane. That's why they are called Nutters!
Like I said above, “who needs evidence when you can just make up stuff (the motto of CTs everywhere).”
NoTrueFlags Here
2023-11-29 16:15:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Hank Sienzant
Post by NoTrueFlags Here
Post by Hank Sienzant
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by JE Corbett
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a few
cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less than
what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues to
wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor. 99+% of the
population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient history.
Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it. The
news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of
assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the country,
it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit what we
say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK assassination.
Another of your lies.
No interest in the subject ?
Another of your lies. I didn't say there was no interest in the subject. I said interest was waning. Why do you have to lie to
make your point.
Post by Gil Jesus
If that's true, then why are you here ?
For amusement only. I have no illusions that anything written here by anybody is going to move the needle of public opinion.
Post by Gil Jesus
Your presence here and those of your fellow trolls is proof that that's a lie.
Your statement is based on your lie that I said there was no interest in the subject. What the hell did you think I meant when
" Only a few small niche groups of assassination buffs continue to argue about it."?
Everyone who contributes to this forum, outside of the spammers, ia part of the niche groups of which I spoke.
Post by Gil Jesus
You're willing to waste your life coming in here arguing every day with people you don't even know about a case ( according to you people ) that was closed 60 years ago.
The case was closed 59 years ago with the publication of the WCR which remains the definitive explanation of the
assassination. The HSCA reopened the investigation and got a lot wrong although they did correctly ID Oswald as the
assassin. Ever since then bozos like you have been trying exonerate that little piece of shit without success.
Post by Gil Jesus
Do athletes continue to play the game after the clock runs out and the game is over ?
Who said this was a game. It's a clown show. The LNs just keep pointing that out to the clowns.
Post by Gil Jesus
Do lawyers continue to debate a case after the jury has rendered its verdict ?
Actually, yes. It's called the appeals process.
Post by Gil Jesus
Why would anyone continue to debate a case that has been closed ?
To point out the futility of the clowns.
Post by Gil Jesus
Does that make any sense ?
Probably not but who says amusement has to make sense.
Post by Gil Jesus
What the hell do you hope to accomplish by doing that ?
I'm not here to accomplish anything. I don't expect to change the minds of the clowns and I don't have any reason to believe
there are undecided lurkers out there. However, I did play a part in changing the mind of Dr. Bob Artwohl about 30 years
ago on the old Prodigy board. He came to that group a CT and left an LN and pointed to some of my arguments that had
changed his mind.
I arrived after you did and I recall a conspiracy theorist accused Bob of using an acronym backwards as his last name.
That particular CT said Artwohl stood for Lee Harvey Oswald Was The Real Assassin.
Hey, who needs evidence when you can just make up stuff (the motto of CTs everywhere).
Post by JE Corbett
I'm sure other LNs influenced him as well. He later became a contributor on the McAdams board but that
was before I got involved back in 2008. I don't know if he ever posted on this one.
At the time, Bob was an emergency room physician in Baltimore, MD, so no doubt he saw his share of bullet wounds. Last I looked, he was in private practice so where in Alaska.
Here Nutter Loon Hank Sienzant cites "Bob" as a probable bullet wound expert because he thinks "Bob" worked in an emergency room. And because "Bob" is a Nutter Loon, no doubt his primary qualification. Nutters really are insane. That's why they are called Nutters!
Like I said above, “who needs evidence when you can just make up stuff (the motto of CTs everywhere).”
You're the only thing I've ever heard say that motto, and it suits you well. You won't even bother to go down in your basement to find some evidence.
Ben Holmes
2023-11-29 17:51:39 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 08:02:19 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<***@aol.com> wrote:

You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.

More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

Are you proud of yourself?
JE Corbett
2023-11-29 13:19:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Hank Sienzant
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by JE Corbett
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a few
cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less than
what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues to
wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor. 99+% of the
population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient history.
Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it. The
news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of
assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the country,
it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit what we
say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK assassination.
Another of your lies.
No interest in the subject ?
Another of your lies. I didn't say there was no interest in the subject. I said interest was waning. Why do you have to lie to
make your point.
Post by Gil Jesus
If that's true, then why are you here ?
For amusement only. I have no illusions that anything written here by anybody is going to move the needle of public opinion.
Post by Gil Jesus
Your presence here and those of your fellow trolls is proof that that's a lie.
Your statement is based on your lie that I said there was no interest in the subject. What the hell did you think I meant when
" Only a few small niche groups of assassination buffs continue to argue about it."?
Everyone who contributes to this forum, outside of the spammers, ia part of the niche groups of which I spoke.
Post by Gil Jesus
You're willing to waste your life coming in here arguing every day with people you don't even know about a case ( according to you people ) that was closed 60 years ago.
The case was closed 59 years ago with the publication of the WCR which remains the definitive explanation of the
assassination. The HSCA reopened the investigation and got a lot wrong although they did correctly ID Oswald as the
assassin. Ever since then bozos like you have been trying exonerate that little piece of shit without success.
Post by Gil Jesus
Do athletes continue to play the game after the clock runs out and the game is over ?
Who said this was a game. It's a clown show. The LNs just keep pointing that out to the clowns.
Post by Gil Jesus
Do lawyers continue to debate a case after the jury has rendered its verdict ?
Actually, yes. It's called the appeals process.
Post by Gil Jesus
Why would anyone continue to debate a case that has been closed ?
To point out the futility of the clowns.
Post by Gil Jesus
Does that make any sense ?
Probably not but who says amusement has to make sense.
Post by Gil Jesus
What the hell do you hope to accomplish by doing that ?
I'm not here to accomplish anything. I don't expect to change the minds of the clowns and I don't have any reason to believe
there are undecided lurkers out there. However, I did play a part in changing the mind of Dr. Bob Artwohl about 30 years
ago on the old Prodigy board. He came to that group a CT and left an LN and pointed to some of my arguments that had
changed his mind.
I arrived after you did and I recall a conspiracy theorist accused Bob of using an acronym backwards as his last name.
That particular CT said Artwohl stood for Lee Harvey Oswald Was The Real Assassin.
Hey, who needs evidence when you can just make up stuff (the motto of CTs everywhere).
I must have missed that one. I'm sure I would have remembered something that silly. I don't know if the Dr. Robert Artwohl
in the link below is the same one we came to know, but it does show that Artwohl is a real name.

https://alaskaveinclinic.com/
Post by Hank Sienzant
Post by JE Corbett
I'm sure other LNs influenced him as well. He later became a contributor on the McAdams board but that
was before I got involved back in 2008. I don't know if he ever posted on this one.
At the time, Bob was an emergency room physician in Baltimore, MD, so no doubt he saw his share of bullet wounds. Last I looked, he was in private practice so where in Alaska.
OK, so it looks like the Bob Artwohl in the link I provided is that same guy. Good to know he's still doing well. I think many LNs
were at one time CTs including me. The difference is that once we took a closer look at the evidence, we realized there was
no doubt Oswald was the assassin and no reason to believe he had accomplices.
Ben Holmes
2023-11-29 17:52:58 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 05:19:23 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Hank Sienzant
Hey, who needs evidence when you can just make up stuff (the motto of CTs everywhere).
I must have missed that one. I'm sure I would have remembered something that silly.
When Huckster lies, you believe him???
Hank Sienzant
2023-11-29 18:22:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Hank Sienzant
Post by JE Corbett
Post by Gil Jesus
Post by JE Corbett
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a few
cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less than
what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues to
wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor. 99+% of the
population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient history.
Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it. The
news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of
assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the country,
it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit what we
say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK assassination.
Another of your lies.
No interest in the subject ?
Another of your lies. I didn't say there was no interest in the subject. I said interest was waning. Why do you have to lie to
make your point.
Post by Gil Jesus
If that's true, then why are you here ?
For amusement only. I have no illusions that anything written here by anybody is going to move the needle of public opinion.
Post by Gil Jesus
Your presence here and those of your fellow trolls is proof that that's a lie.
Your statement is based on your lie that I said there was no interest in the subject. What the hell did you think I meant when
" Only a few small niche groups of assassination buffs continue to argue about it."?
Everyone who contributes to this forum, outside of the spammers, ia part of the niche groups of which I spoke.
Post by Gil Jesus
You're willing to waste your life coming in here arguing every day with people you don't even know about a case ( according to you people ) that was closed 60 years ago.
The case was closed 59 years ago with the publication of the WCR which remains the definitive explanation of the
assassination. The HSCA reopened the investigation and got a lot wrong although they did correctly ID Oswald as the
assassin. Ever since then bozos like you have been trying exonerate that little piece of shit without success.
Post by Gil Jesus
Do athletes continue to play the game after the clock runs out and the game is over ?
Who said this was a game. It's a clown show. The LNs just keep pointing that out to the clowns.
Post by Gil Jesus
Do lawyers continue to debate a case after the jury has rendered its verdict ?
Actually, yes. It's called the appeals process.
Post by Gil Jesus
Why would anyone continue to debate a case that has been closed ?
To point out the futility of the clowns.
Post by Gil Jesus
Does that make any sense ?
Probably not but who says amusement has to make sense.
Post by Gil Jesus
What the hell do you hope to accomplish by doing that ?
I'm not here to accomplish anything. I don't expect to change the minds of the clowns and I don't have any reason to believe
there are undecided lurkers out there. However, I did play a part in changing the mind of Dr. Bob Artwohl about 30 years
ago on the old Prodigy board. He came to that group a CT and left an LN and pointed to some of my arguments that had
changed his mind.
I arrived after you did and I recall a conspiracy theorist accused Bob of using an acronym backwards as his last name.
That particular CT said Artwohl stood for Lee Harvey Oswald Was The Real Assassin.
Hey, who needs evidence when you can just make up stuff (the motto of CTs everywhere).
I must have missed that one. I'm sure I would have remembered something that silly. I don't know if the Dr. Robert Artwohl
in the link below is the same one we came to know, but it does show that Artwohl is a real name.
https://alaskaveinclinic.com/
Post by Hank Sienzant
Post by JE Corbett
I'm sure other LNs influenced him as well. He later became a contributor on the McAdams board but that
was before I got involved back in 2008. I don't know if he ever posted on this one.
At the time, Bob was an emergency room physician in Baltimore, MD, so no doubt he saw his share of bullet wounds. Last I looked, he was in private practice so where in Alaska.
OK, so it looks like the Bob Artwohl in the link I provided is that same guy. Good to know he's still doing well. I think many LNs
were at one time CTs including me.
And I.

I started with “Who Killed Kennedy” (Buchanan), and moved on to “Whitewash” (Weisberg), “Rush to Judgment” (Lanr), “Accessories After the Fact” (Meagher), and “Six Seconds in Dallas” (Thompson). They seemed to make good points, but it wasn't until I stopped taking their word for what the evidence shows and started to check it out for myself that I realized his they were twisting things.
Post by JE Corbett
The difference is that once we took a closer look at the evidence, we realized there was
no doubt Oswald was the assassin and no reason to believe he had accomplices.
Ben Holmes
2023-11-29 18:50:22 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 10:22:41 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
I started with “Who Killed Kennedy” (Buchanan), and moved on to
“Whitewash” (Weisberg), “Rush to Judgment” (Lanr), “Accessories After
the Fact” (Meagher), and “Six Seconds in Dallas” (Thompson). They
seemed to make good points, but it wasn't until I stopped taking their
word for what the evidence shows and started to check it out for
myself that I realized his they were twisting things.
You can't support this anymore than you've been able to support these:

You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.

More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

Are you proud of yourself?

You're simply a liar who runs from his own words... and can't support
'em.

JE Corbett
2023-11-29 13:26:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Hank Sienzant
At the time, Bob was an emergency room physician in Baltimore, MD, so no doubt he saw his share of bullet wounds. Last I looked, he was in private practice so where in Alaska.
Now that you mention it, I do remember during the Prodigy days, Bob was practicing somewhere on the east coast but I
would be lying if I said I remembered it was Baltimore. I do remember he told the group that he ran into Dr. Perry at a seminar
they were both attending. He ended up at the same lunch table as Perry. He said the subject of the assassination came up but
Perry was reluctant to talk about it.
Ben Holmes
2023-11-29 17:43:07 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 20:31:22 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
<***@aol.com> wrote:

You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.

More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

Are you proud of yourself?
Ben Holmes
2023-11-28 15:49:19 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 19:29:45 -0800 (PST), JE Corbett
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected...
Your expectations *SHOULD* have been for silence.

You were wrong.
Donald Willis
2023-11-28 16:52:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by JE Corbett
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a few
cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less than
what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues to
wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor.
I guess I missed this bit of history.

99+% of the
Post by JE Corbett
population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient history.
Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it. The
news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of
assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the country,
it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit what we
say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK assassination.
NoTrueFlags Here
2023-11-28 17:06:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Donald Willis
Post by JE Corbett
JFK has now been dead 14 years more than he was alive. As expected, a few
cable channels ran programs regarding the assassination which were much less than they ran for the 50th anniversary which in turn were much less than
what was run for the 40th anniversary. Interest in the subject continues to
wane just as it has for the German's attack on Pearl Harbor.
I guess I missed this bit of history.
99+% of the
Post by JE Corbett
population just doesn't give a shit about it any more. It's ancient history.
Almost nobody talks about it. Politicians aren't making an issue of it. The
news media has all but forgotten it. Only a few small niche groups of
assassination buffs continue to argue about it. For the rest of the country,
it just doesn't matter anymore. The general public doesn't give a shit what we
say in this group and the few other forums dedicated to the JFK assassination.
Haha! Sometimes it pays to actually read what Corbett writes!
Loading...