Post by Gil JesusPost by Ben HolmesOn Thu, 8 Feb 2024 09:45:28 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
According to you. But you’re biased in favor of your own believes...
Isn't this the same moron who just got through pointing out a mispelling by me?
This is why I don't respond to them. Their offerings are nothing more than bullshit.
I don't have time to participate in a bullshit session.
I don't have time for their nonsensical speculation, comments, insults and questions.
I deal in official records and I expect those who want to have a civil debate on the evidence to do so as well.
No, you won’t engage with me whatsoever, especially when I quote from the official records to show exactly how you are misusing them. I quote from law books to further establish how you don’t understand what constitutes chain of custody. You ran screaming as if your hair was on fire.
Post by Gil JesusThese people are frauds. They're only here for "entertainment".
Engaging them with evidence is like trying to explain quantum physics to a four year old.
I was a college physics major. That’s a particularly poor analogy for you to use.
What was your major?
Post by Gil JesusCan't wait for Feb. 22nd, when the adults take over the discussion.
Translation: Can't wait for Feb. 22nd, when I don’t have to see how wrong I am pointed out on a daily basis.
Meanwhile, as just one example from this thread of what you are running from, there’s this:
— quote —
Post by Gil JesusOver the last 20 or 25 years in this newsgroup, these people as a group have done a piss-poor job of defending the Warren Commission's case against Oswald.
According to you. But you’re biased in favor of your own believes, so you aren’t exactly the best judge of who is doing a piss-poor job, are you?
Post by Gil JesusThey've ignored the way the authorities handled Oswald.
Pretty much as other defendants were handled in that era.
Post by Gil JesusThey've ignored the way the authorities handled the evidence.
Pretty much as other evidence was handled in that era.
Post by Gil JesusThey've ignored the way the authorities handled the witnesses.
Pretty much as other witnesses were handled in that era.
Your beef is with the era, not the case. You simply don’t realize that.
Post by Gil JesusAll of these tactics, which one would not find in a normal criminal investigation, is completely acceptable to them.
What tactics? Do spell it out, be willing to present evidence that Oswald was treated differently than other defendants of that era, that the evidence was treated differently, and the witnesses as well, *in that era*.
Thus far, I have seen you compare apples to oranges, and compare modern practices to those of 60 years ago, and find the old practices wanting. So what?
Post by Gil JesusWhy ? Because they're cowards afraid of the truth. They're afraid to look under their beds to see if there's a monster there.
They're afraid of the dark. They're afraid of the truth.
No, Gil. Maybe we’ve looked under the bed and realized you are imagining Boogie Men Conspirators where none exist.
Post by Gil JesusEspecially in today's political climate, where the "swamp" or "deep state" or whatever you want to call it, is doing everything it can to keep one Presidential candidate out of the White House,
they can't see that this corruption started way back in 1963.
Which candidate in 1963 was kept off the ballot in the 1964 election?
Post by Gil JesusNo, they might be corrupt today, but they'd never do that back in 1963.
They might lie to the people today, but not in 1963.
They might remove a President from office today, but not in 1963.
These Lone Nutters are either naive or in denial.
They can't see that the reason why we are in the position we're in today is because elements of the CIA got away with murder in 1963.
You say this, but you’ve never come close to marshalling the evidence to support that claim.
Post by Gil JesusThe corruption in government allowed them to get away with it.
Once you get away with murder, you can do whatever you want.
No, even a Ted Bundy eventually gets caught, tried, and convicted. When do you think one of your supposed conspirators will find himself behind bars, Gil? Anytime in the next century?
Post by Gil JesusYou can break the laws of the land without fear of prosecution.
You can steal from the people and subsequent generations.
You can fix elections.
You can open the borders to allow millions of new "voters" into the country, voters who will be grateful to you for letting them in.
Ply them with thousands of dollars of benefits, essentially buying their votes.
Then after the election, leave them hanging like you do to your citizens.
None of this has anything to do with the JFK assassination. But I admire your imagination.
Post by Gil JesusWhen you're corrupt and free from the fear of prosecution, you can get away with any crime, including murder.
The murder of John Kennedy proved that.
The murderer was dead within 48 hours of committing the murder of JFK and Tippit. He didn’t get away with it.
— unquote —