Discussion:
Huckster Sienzan - Proven Moron!
(too old to reply)
Ben Holmes
2023-12-22 18:03:23 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 02:49:19 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:57:31 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:41:50 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
You snipped what Bud wrote...
Snipped again.
So avoidance of the points made. Noted.
Hypocrite, aren't you?
Why do you say that, Ben?
I'm a big believer in the truth... I know you HATE such things to be
pointed out... but they're true regardless.
P.S. You really *should* go help out Chickenshit - he thinks that the
location of the large head wound described by the prosectors is
described by the A, B, C, D subparagraphs.
Attempt to shift the burden of proof.
So you actually believe that the location of the large head wound in
JFK is to be defined by subpara A,B,C,D???

You're just as much a moron as Chickenshit.
Ben Holmes
2023-12-22 18:06:26 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 10:03:23 -0800, Ben Holmes
Post by Ben Holmes
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 02:49:19 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:57:31 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:41:50 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
You snipped what Bud wrote...
Snipped again.
So avoidance of the points made. Noted.
Hypocrite, aren't you?
Why do you say that, Ben?
I'm a big believer in the truth... I know you HATE such things to be
pointed out... but they're true regardless.
P.S. You really *should* go help out Chickenshit - he thinks that the
location of the large head wound described by the prosectors is
described by the A, B, C, D subparagraphs.
Attempt to shift the burden of proof.
So you actually believe that the location of the large head wound in
JFK is to be defined by subpara A,B,C,D???
You're just as much a moron as Chickenshit.
Dropped a 't' somewhere... put it back in.
Ben Holmes
2023-12-27 16:17:36 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 10:03:23 -0800, Ben Holmes
Post by Ben Holmes
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 02:49:19 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 15:57:31 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:41:50 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant
You snipped what Bud wrote...
Snipped again.
So avoidance of the points made. Noted.
Hypocrite, aren't you?
Why do you say that, Ben?
I'm a big believer in the truth... I know you HATE such things to be
pointed out... but they're true regardless.
P.S. You really *should* go help out Chickenshit - he thinks that the
location of the large head wound described by the prosectors is
described by the A, B, C, D subparagraphs.
Attempt to shift the burden of proof.
So you actually believe that the location of the large head wound in
JFK is to be defined by subpara A,B,C,D???
You're just as much a moron as Chickenshit.
Even Huckster is unwilling to defend Chickenshit's wacky assertion.
Loading...