Huckster Sienzant Is TERRIFIED Of The Evidence!

[Ben Holmes]

Huckster has recently doubled down on his "explanation" for the
contradicting documents regarding the paper in the "paper sack."

He pretends that someone merely typed up two possible variants of the
test results in advance.

Of course, anyone who'd bothered to READ this citation:

https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Proof_the_FBI_Changed_Documents_and_Vincent_Bugliosi_Was_Wrong.html

... knows that such a theory is dead in the water from the beginning.

Given the chance to correct himself - as the evidence clearly shows
that the "wrong" report was actually sent out everywhere... and an FBI
memo documented EXACTLY WHAT I STATED - that the FBI was willing to
change documents... Huckster simply ran away.

HUCKSTER SIMPLY RAN AWAY!!!

He can hardly wait for Feb 22nd, when he'll have an excuse not to post
and explain his proven lies.

But nothing other than dishonest cowardice is preventing him from
explaining why his "explanation" fails to explain the known facts.

Huckster's a coward.

EVERY

SINGLE

TIME!!!

[Hank Sienzant]

Post by Ben Holmes
Huckster has recently doubled down on his "explanation" for the
contradicting documents regarding the paper in the "paper sack."
He pretends that someone merely typed up two possible variants of the
test results in advance.
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Proof_the_FBI_Changed_Documents_and_Vincent_Bugliosi_Was_Wrong.html
... knows that such a theory is dead in the water from the beginning.
Given the chance to correct himself - as the evidence clearly shows
that the "wrong" report was actually sent out everywhere... and an FBI
memo documented EXACTLY WHAT I STATED - that the FBI was willing to
change documents... Huckster simply ran away.
HUCKSTER SIMPLY RAN AWAY!!!
He can hardly wait for Feb 22nd, when he'll have an excuse not to post
and explain his proven lies.
But nothing other than dishonest cowardice is preventing him from
explaining why his "explanation" fails to explain the known facts.
Huckster's a coward.
EVERY
SINGLE
TIME!!!

Ball is still in your court as I explained here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/0AImUcgnD3E/m/9yUg0rO5AQAJ
“Explain why. Quote the passage that you claim makes my argument “dead in the water”
Go ahead. We’ll wait.”

Still waiting!

Repeating the same claim ad infinitum is not the same thing as proving your claim.

[Ben Holmes]

On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 11:02:40 -0800 (PST), Hank Sienzant

Post by Hank Sienzant

Post by Ben Holmes
Huckster has recently doubled down on his "explanation" for the
contradicting documents regarding the paper in the "paper sack."
He pretends that someone merely typed up two possible variants of the
test results in advance.
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Essay_-_Proof_the_FBI_Changed_Documents_and_Vincent_Bugliosi_Was_Wrong.html
... knows that such a theory is dead in the water from the beginning.
Given the chance to correct himself - as the evidence clearly shows
that the "wrong" report was actually sent out everywhere... and an FBI
memo documented EXACTLY WHAT I STATED - that the FBI was willing to
change documents... Huckster simply ran away.
HUCKSTER SIMPLY RAN AWAY!!!
He can hardly wait for Feb 22nd, when he'll have an excuse not to post
and explain his proven lies.
But nothing other than dishonest cowardice is preventing him from
explaining why his "explanation" fails to explain the known facts.
Huckster's a coward.
EVERY
SINGLE
TIME!!!

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/0AImUcgnD3E/m/9yUg0rO5AQAJ
“Explain why. Quote the passage that you claim makes my argument “dead in the water”
Go ahead. We’ll wait.”
Still waiting!
Repeating the same claim ad infinitum is not the same thing as proving your claim.

STILL A COWARD, AREN'T YOU HUCKSTER???

I quite clearly pointed out the fact that *BOTH* versions were sent
out.

Ball has ALWAYS been in your court - it's your case, you need to make
it.

But you can't:

You've claimed that the "A.B.C.D." in the Autopsy Report is the
description of the *location* of the large head wound.

Yet you refuse time and time again from QUOTING the preceding
paragraph that describes what this ACTUALLY is. Why is that?

You've also claimed that the prosectors dissected the throat wound.

Why do you continue to refuse to cite any evidence for this?

Why have you CONSISTENTLY run away each time I raise this issue?

Now you've quite stupidly insisted that the bullet entered JFK's back,
and exited the back of his head.

More cowardice, more stupidity, more dishonesty.

Are you proud of yourself?