JE Corbett
2023-11-15 15:44:42 UTC
During my force absence from this group for the past week, I have been
reduced to being a lurker. I have continued to be amused by Giltardo's never
ending questions. The game show Jeopardy is the only place I know of where
one can score points by asking questions. Everyplace else, you need to provide
answers. Giltardo seems to have none. He seems to think he can make a case
either for Oswald's innocence or the existence of a conspiracy simply by
asking inane questions. The questions fall into two categories. Ones for which
the answer is known and Giltardo is too lazy to look it up. The other are
questions for which the answer in unknowable and not necessary to establish
Oswald's guilt. For example, his question regarding the name of the USPS
employee who handed Oswald the rifle he ordered. What the hell difference
does that make.
If the questions are not answered to Giltardo's satisfaction, he thinks he has
made his point. It is nothing more than the long time CT tactic of burden
shifting. Like CTs have been doing for decades, Giltardo continues to shoot
blanks. He is accomplishing nothing. The LNs have no burden. We are
perfectly content with the status quo. History has recorded Oswald as the
assassin and it has also recorded that a large segment of the population
don't believe he acted alone. The LNs know that neither of these are likely
to change. We can live with that. If Giltardo thinks he is going to change the
historical conclusion that Oswald was the assassin, he is going to have to
do a lot more than ask asinine questions.
reduced to being a lurker. I have continued to be amused by Giltardo's never
ending questions. The game show Jeopardy is the only place I know of where
one can score points by asking questions. Everyplace else, you need to provide
answers. Giltardo seems to have none. He seems to think he can make a case
either for Oswald's innocence or the existence of a conspiracy simply by
asking inane questions. The questions fall into two categories. Ones for which
the answer is known and Giltardo is too lazy to look it up. The other are
questions for which the answer in unknowable and not necessary to establish
Oswald's guilt. For example, his question regarding the name of the USPS
employee who handed Oswald the rifle he ordered. What the hell difference
does that make.
If the questions are not answered to Giltardo's satisfaction, he thinks he has
made his point. It is nothing more than the long time CT tactic of burden
shifting. Like CTs have been doing for decades, Giltardo continues to shoot
blanks. He is accomplishing nothing. The LNs have no burden. We are
perfectly content with the status quo. History has recorded Oswald as the
assassin and it has also recorded that a large segment of the population
don't believe he acted alone. The LNs know that neither of these are likely
to change. We can live with that. If Giltardo thinks he is going to change the
historical conclusion that Oswald was the assassin, he is going to have to
do a lot more than ask asinine questions.
