Discussion:
Huckster Joking Again...
(too old to reply)
Ben Holmes
2023-12-22 18:05:06 UTC
Permalink
HENRY!!!

Since you're clearly responding right now... let's see you run from
this:

Repost: Getting back to the evidence... a thing that believers HATE:

"No credible evidence suggests that the shots were fired from the
railroad bridge over the Triple Underpass, the nearby railroad yards
or any place other than the Texas School Book Depository Building."
(WCR 61)

Only by ignoring the overwhelming mass of eyewitnesses can the WC make
a statement such as this. And since the legal system in America *does*
accept eyewitness testimony as "credible evidence", the WC was simply
lying. ...
Stop right there. There is no such thing as the U.S. Judicial
system accepting all eyewitness testimony as "credible evidence" as
you claim."
You're lying again, Henry.

More importantly, you KNOW you're lying.

Tell us, why do you think that you can support your belief with lies?

******************************************************************

Now tell us Henry... *where* did I state that the U.S. Judicial system
accepts "all eyewitness testimony as "credible evidence"?

You stated that I'd made that claim.

Now QUOTE ME SAYING SO!!!

Or admit you've been caught "joking" again...

Or run away again...

(Such AMAZING cowardice!!!)
Ben Holmes
2023-12-27 16:16:59 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 10:05:06 -0800, Ben Holmes
Post by Ben Holmes
HENRY!!!
Since you're clearly responding right now... let's see you run from
"No credible evidence suggests that the shots were fired from the
railroad bridge over the Triple Underpass, the nearby railroad yards
or any place other than the Texas School Book Depository Building."
(WCR 61)
Only by ignoring the overwhelming mass of eyewitnesses can the WC make
a statement such as this. And since the legal system in America *does*
accept eyewitness testimony as "credible evidence", the WC was simply
lying. ...
Stop right there. There is no such thing as the U.S. Judicial
system accepting all eyewitness testimony as "credible evidence" as
you claim."
You're lying again, Henry.
More importantly, you KNOW you're lying.
Tell us, why do you think that you can support your belief with lies?
******************************************************************
Now tell us Henry... *where* did I state that the U.S. Judicial system
accepts "all eyewitness testimony as "credible evidence"?
You stated that I'd made that claim.
Now QUOTE ME SAYING SO!!!
Or admit you've been caught "joking" again...
Or run away again...
(Such AMAZING cowardice!!!)
What's really funny is that even Chickenshit, who likes to reflexively
respond to anything I post - is silent.

He can't defend Huckster either.

Loading...