Discussion:
John Wilkes Booth was framed
(too old to reply)
bigdog
2008-01-17 14:43:46 UTC
Permalink
He was just a patsy. No one saw him fire a shot at Lincoln. The bullet
that killed Lincoln was never matched to the gun. No one can prove
Booth actually owned the gun either. Booth was conveniently lynched by
federal troops so he could never defend himself at trial. Booth was
never convicted of Lincoln's murder. It's time for this historical
injustice to be remedied. Our history books should be rewritten to
reflect the fact that the killer of Abraham Lincoln was never
identified.
J***@aol.com
2008-01-17 15:58:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by bigdog
He was just a patsy. No one saw him fire a shot at Lincoln. The bullet
that killed Lincoln was never matched to the gun. No one can prove
Booth actually owned the gun either. Booth was conveniently lynched by
federal troops so he could never defend himself at trial. Booth was
never convicted of Lincoln's murder. It's time for this historical
injustice to be remedied. Our history books should be rewritten to
reflect the fact that the killer of Abraham Lincoln was never
identified.
At the very least the history books should be altered to note that
Booth -- like Oswald -- was never convicted of murder in a court of
law and, therefore, presumed innocent. Neither was Adolf Hitler for
that matter but I'm not sure how far we want to carry this thing.

JGL
bigdog
2008-01-17 18:46:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by J***@aol.com
Post by bigdog
He was just a patsy. No one saw him fire a shot at Lincoln. The bullet
that killed Lincoln was never matched to the gun. No one can prove
Booth actually owned the gun either. Booth was conveniently lynched by
federal troops so he could never defend himself at trial. Booth was
never convicted of Lincoln's murder. It's time for this historical
injustice to be remedied. Our history books should be rewritten to
reflect the fact that the killer of Abraham Lincoln was never
identified.
At the very least the history books should be altered to note that
Booth -- like Oswald -- was never convicted of murder in a court of
law and, therefore, presumed innocent.  Neither was Adolf Hitler for
that matter but I'm not sure how far we want to carry this thing.
JGL
Osama Bin Laden has never been convicted, so he is innocent to. Why
don't we leave the poor guy alone.
Ronald 'More-More' Moshki
2008-01-18 06:27:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by J***@aol.com
Post by bigdog
He was just a patsy. No one saw him fire a shot at Lincoln. The bullet
that killed Lincoln was never matched to the gun. No one can prove
Booth actually owned the gun either. Booth was conveniently lynched by
federal troops so he could never defend himself at trial. Booth was
never convicted of Lincoln's murder. It's time for this historical
injustice to be remedied. Our history books should be rewritten to
reflect the fact that the killer of Abraham Lincoln was never
identified.
At the very least the history books should be altered to note that
Booth -- like Oswald -- was never convicted of murder in a court of
law and, therefore, presumed innocent.  Neither was Adolf Hitler for
that matter but I'm not sure how far we want to carry this thing.
JGL
Adolfo Hitleriano killed himself--big difference.
Phil Ossofee
2008-01-18 08:40:31 UTC
Permalink
Why would you believe in a conspiracy in Lincoln's death my dear lone
nutter? Hell, there is about 200 times as much good evidence of
conspiracy in the JFK case.
bigdog
2008-01-18 13:42:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Phil Ossofee
Why would you believe in a conspiracy in Lincoln's death my dear lone
nutter? Hell, there is about 200 times as much good evidence of
conspiracy in the JFK case.
You need to check your history books. There was a conspiracy to kill
Lincoln. Four of his co-conspirators were hanged and several sent to
prison. After 44 years, we have had only one other person charged with
complicity in a ridiculous show trial staged by a publicity seeking
prosecutor. The jury acquitted him for total lack of evidence. No
other person has been charged and there is no physical evidence of
anyone else having taken part in the shooting.

As for my tongue-in-cheek comments about Booth's innocence, they are a
parody of some of the popular arguments many have used to exonerate
Oswald.
aeffects
2008-01-18 16:08:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by bigdog
He was just a patsy. No one saw him fire a shot at Lincoln. The bullet
that killed Lincoln was never matched to the gun. No one can prove
Booth actually owned the gun either. Booth was conveniently lynched by
federal troops so he could never defend himself at trial. Booth was
never convicted of Lincoln's murder. It's time for this historical
injustice to be remedied. Our history books should be rewritten to
reflect the fact that the killer of Abraham Lincoln was never
identified.
sure you can find another board for this, hon.... english your second
language, too?
bigdog
2008-01-18 19:03:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by aeffects
Post by bigdog
He was just a patsy. No one saw him fire a shot at Lincoln. The bullet
that killed Lincoln was never matched to the gun. No one can prove
Booth actually owned the gun either. Booth was conveniently lynched by
federal troops so he could never defend himself at trial. Booth was
never convicted of Lincoln's murder. It's time for this historical
injustice to be remedied. Our history books should be rewritten to
reflect the fact that the killer of Abraham Lincoln was never
identified.
sure you can find another board for this, hon.... english your second
language, too?
Larry, you master Holmes is calling. I think he wants a quickie.
Sam Brown
2008-01-19 00:51:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by aeffects
Post by bigdog
He was just a patsy. No one saw him fire a shot at Lincoln. The bullet
that killed Lincoln was never matched to the gun. No one can prove
Booth actually owned the gun either. Booth was conveniently lynched by
federal troops so he could never defend himself at trial. Booth was
never convicted of Lincoln's murder. It's time for this historical
injustice to be remedied. Our history books should be rewritten to
reflect the fact that the killer of Abraham Lincoln was never
identified.
sure you can find another board for this, hon.... english your second
language, too?
Larry, you master Holmes is calling. I think he wants a quickie.

At least defects acknowledged his own inept ability with English when he
used the term "too". What a complete moron, he's hilarious.

Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...