Post by Gil JesusPost by Hank SienzantYou mean all those bad things I said about myself, don’t you? :D
Or all those bad things I said about you?
Yes, I too am amused at the ‘analysis’ by Gil. I was tempted to immediately post to disprove Gil’s utter nonsense that Gil has once more subjected us to, but decided to watch this play out to see how critics take their own misunderstandings as a given, and then reason themselves into a corner from there. This opportunity was too good to pass up.
Perhaps Gil should re-read the post by Backes and understand that Backes is talking about two different posters, one of whom is you and the other is me. Backes butchers his argument by thinking I’m arguing for Connally body alterations, when I was arguing against it.
For example, Backes wrote: “Instead, these idiots think Connally’s wounds were altered. In all my years as a JFK researcher I never heard anyone say anything as stupid as this.”
Now, if Gil understood what the “s” at the end of “idiots” meant above, he would understand that Backes was talking about more than one person. Not just you. But Gil apparently doesn’t understand plurals.
Gil understands when you post something that had nothing to do with you.
Let's recap, shall we ?
https://justiceforkennedy.substack.com/p/mr-no-f-ing-clue-admits-he-made-a?r=1nfutr&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&fbclid=IwAR2ykh1vyG7p0oANAsn6Apux3W-wfNTlmBLilQYwywOCQYhM04K3JSlBQu4
That video quotes a post by me, and Backes responds to that post by me, but misunderstands my point.
Avoid the truth of the matter all you want.
Post by Gil JesusHank responded, "Joe misunderstood MY point-- he thinks I’M arguing for Connally’s wounds being altered, whereas I was pointing out the absurdity of that position."
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/4LhWv2reSOg/m/Ohypk7ahAAAJ
Hank Sienzant's name appeared nowhere in the article. Backes never mentioned him by name. Now he's trying to make up the excuse that when Backes mentioned "idiots", he was talking about Hank.
When Backes responded to what I wrote (as quoted in the video by NTF), that’s when he was talking about what Hank wrote. That’s what I responded to.
Post by Gil JesusAlthough I'm inclined to agree with Backes that Hank is an idiot, as usual with these Lone Nutters, Hank can't prove that's what Backes meant.
Backes quoted me here:
— quote —
So, the forum poster [me, Hank Sienzant] wrote “If all of the shooters were in front of the President, then Connally’s wounds, - which point to the rear - must have been altered as well.”
— unquote —
And I responded to that thusly:
— quote —
Joe misunderstood my point— he thinks I’m arguing for Connally’s wounds being altered, whereas I was pointing out the absurdity of that position.
— unquote —
Post by Gil JesusIf that were the case, Hank would have responded that, "many years ago, I had a conversation with him about............"
What are you taking about?
I have never talked to Backes in person. I wouldn’t know him if I saw him.
Post by Gil JesusInstead, according to Hank, when Backes referred to "idiots" he was talking about him specifically.
Nice try Hank.
That’s your first clue. The second clue was when Backes quoted me.
Post by Gil JesusAgain, this is my OPINION, based on what I'm reading.
Your opinion is ill-informed once more, based on what you are reading.
Post by Gil JesusThe other possibility is ( as I've pointed out ) Hank responded this to thread under his real identity by mistake. He didn't realize that he was posting under his real name.
[Insert Twilight Zone theme here].
Post by Gil JesusHe thought he was responding under the screenname "NoTrueFlagsHere".
Hence, his response to an article that didn't even mention his name.
But quoted and responded erroneously to my argument. Make sure you ignore that some more.
Post by Gil JesusA short time ago, he posted a rash of anti-Hank posts under, "NoTrueFlags Here" in order to "cover his ass" just in case someone was to figure out he was using a dual identity.
[Insert Twilight Zone theme here].
Post by Gil JesusHow could anyone think Hank was posting under "NoTrueFlags Here" ? Was he attacking himself ?
Yes he was. And as Ben has pointed out, this newsgroup has had a history of Lone Nutters who posted under aliases.
[Insert Twilight Zone theme here].
Post by Gil JesusTwo that come to mind are the assholes Paul May ( YoHarvey ) and Linda Cunningham ( JustMe1952 ).
Why would anybody think that Hank would do that ?
Because this would not have been the first time Hank has used an alias on line.
If you remember, Hank was the notorious Lone Nutter "Joe Zircon" back in the early 2000s.
Didn't know I was notorious.
A. What did I do to earn that notoriety?
B. How do you know that? I admitted it after about a five-year absence upon my return.
Respond to the points I make. This nonsense about the names (explained multiple times - my first wife did not want me posting under my real name because she thought you guys were dangerous) is a way for you to poison the well - a logical fallacy - is merely a smoke screen to avoid responding to the points I make. You reveal the paucity of your arguments with these logical fallacies.
Post by Gil JesusSo, using an alias is nothing knew to Hank and his hanky-panky is nothing knew to newsgroups.
That's his MO.
[Insert Twilight Zone theme here].
Post by Gil JesusThe difference now is that soon he and the other Lone Nut idiots are going to have to pay to play their little games.
Or not.
Post by Gil JesusThey're going to have to pay for a newsreader and then an NNTP server.
And that will cost about $100-200/ year.
Is that what you pay, when you could be posting for free using Google?
Money well-spent, you think?
Post by Gil JesusWill Hanky and the Nutters be forced to return to the free but moderated EF, where he hasn't posted in 2 years ?
It’s moderated, and with the moderator deceased, there is no one to review and approve posts.
So not one can post there. Did you really not understand the point?
Post by Gil JesusMaybe he can go where all the .johnny refugees went after McAdams took the dirt nap.
This is you, referring to a deceased person you dislike.
Post by Gil JesusWhere have all the .johnny refugees gone, now that their leader is dead and took the keys to "his" newsgroup with him ?
Some came here. Like me.
Post by Gil JesusBoy, McAdams fucked them good, didn't he ?
Not really. I could start a moderated group of my own if I was so inclined.
Post by Gil JesusHis final act in life was to fuck all his friends and supporters out of posting on alt.assassination.jfk.
And they still worship that piece of shit.
Nobody worships John McAdams, and your use of the perjorative reveals your character.
Post by Gil Jesuswww.prouty.org/mcadams
As with nearly all conspiracy articles, ruthlessly slanted with stuff out of context.