Post by Gil JesusPost by JE CorbettWhy is it you can't name a single forensic medical examiner who believes the
medical evidence indicates JFK was struck by a bullet from the front or the
side?
Because no forensic medical examiner saw the wound before the tracheostomy was done.
Neither the original autopsy team nor the FPP panel got to see the wound before the tracheostomy incision was made and
they were able to unanimously conclude that the bullet exited from the throat. Why do you suppose that is, Giltardo? Why do
you assume that if they had seen the wound before it was cut into, they would have concluded it was an entrance wound?
Post by Gil Jesus1. Name one person who saw the throat wound BEFORE the tracheostomy was done and described it conclusively as an exit wound.
No qualified medical examiner saw the wound before the incision was made. There are other ways to determine that was a
wound of exit. They saw the wound in the back which was conclusively an entrance wound. They saw the trail of tissue with
a contusion of the pleura and the damage to strap muscles and the trachea. This trail led from the entrance wound to the
tracheotomy incision. One would have to be a moron to know all that and not figure out the bullet exited from the throat.
Post by Gil Jesus2. Tells us why the Dallas doctors were not qualified to identify an entrance wound.
Because that is not what they were trained to do. Forensic pathology is a specific discipline which requires specific training
to understand how entrance wounds and exit wounds differ. One cannot determine whether a bullet wound is an entrance or
exit simply looking at the size and shape of the wound. A small round hole can be an entrance or an exit. Perry made the
erroneous assumption was an entrance wound simply by observing the size and shape. He later acknowledged that it could
have been either and by his own admission lacked the qualifications to make that determination.
It is simply illogical to believe that both the back and throat wound could both have been entrances because there were no
other exit wound and no bullets in the body. That is an impossibility. One of the wounds was an entrance and one was an
exit and both the original the original autopsy team and the review panel unanimously concluded the back wound was the
entrance. That kind of narrows it down.
How are you coming with figuring out what my real name is?
